The legislation specifically prohibits the sale of geolocation information without the explicit consent of the user. This means that any geolocation data collected through mobile devices or applications cannot be sold unless the user provides clear and prior consent. Additionally, the bill bans the sale of data collected through eavesdropping, emphasizing the protection of user privacy in both physical and digital realms. The legislation seeks to establish stronger safeguards to prevent violations of privacy rights associated with the use of technology.
Summary
SB3017, relating to privacy, aims to protect the civil rights and liberties of residents and visitors in the State of Hawaii by regulating the sale of geolocation and internet browser information. The bill recognizes the dangers posed by the unrestricted sale of geolocation data, particularly concerning sensitive places, such as reproductive health clinics. It identifies a growing concern that such sales might expose individuals seeking reproductive health services to risks including discrimination, stigma, and physical harm as their geolocation can be tracked and used against them.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding SB3017 is the balance between technological advancement and privacy rights. Opponents may argue that the regulations could hinder lawful business practices that involve data collection and use. On the other hand, proponents highlight the necessity of such protections to safeguard sensitive information and support individuals' rights, particularly for those seeking reproductive health services. The bill reflects a legislative trend towards prioritizing privacy amid concerns about how data is utilized in contemporary society.
Regulatory_changes
By amending Chapter 481B of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, SB3017 seeks to create a framework where personal data rights are expressly recognized and upheld. The bill highlights the explicit definitions of 'sale' and 'user,' ensuring that individuals understand what kind of data can be collected and how it may be used. The comprehensive nature of this regulatory action arguably sets a precedent for future privacy legislation in the state, emphasizing the importance of consent in the digital age.
A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.
Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.