Hawaii Senate Bill SB2692

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/26
• Refer: 1/28/26
• Report Pass: 2/20/26
• Refer: 2/20/26

Caption

Relating To Public Land.

Impact

The proposed bill specifically affects how public land and resources are managed in Hawaii, particularly regarding the process of acquiring private leasehold interests for redevelopment purposes. By allowing the DLNR to acquire the land through eminent domain, the bill could set a precedent for state intervention in local land use, which may raise questions about property rights and the government's role in land development. Notably, the bill includes provisions for community input, allowing public testimony on new uses for the parcel, thus acknowledging community needs and opinions in the decision-making process.

Summary

SB2692 is a legislative proposal aimed at facilitating the acquisition of leasehold interests in a parcel of land currently occupied by the Grand Naniloa Golf Course, situated in the Banyan Drive resort area of Hawaii. The bill empowers the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) to acquire this parcel through means such as eminent domain, thus allowing for the potential redevelopment of the land to better serve public interests. As of now, the usage of this 62.576-acre site as a golf course is seen as underutilized, failing to maximize its benefits for the local community. The state views the acquisition and subsequent redevelopment of the land as a necessary step towards enhancing public welfare and community engagement.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB2692 appears largely supportive within the legislative circles, especially from those who advocate for improved use of public lands to benefit the community. However, the use of eminent domain can stir concerns among property rights advocates and local residents who may feel threatened by the potential state acquisition of their leased land. The necessity of transparent community input mitigates some of these worries but does not eliminate the underlying tensions regarding property ownership and local autonomy.

Contention

A point of contention surrounding SB2692 is the use of eminent domain for land acquisition, which historically involves heated debates about fair compensation for displaced interests and the justification of public benefit. Opponents of such measures may argue that redevelopment efforts could overlook the current utility of the golf course for leisure and tourism, while proponents argue for long-term community benefits. Moreover, the proceedings for changing the current use of the land must be transparent and participatory, reflecting the necessity for community engagement in such significant decisions.