Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2448

Introduced
1/22/26  
Refer
1/28/26  
Report Pass
2/20/26  
Refer
2/20/26  
Report Pass
3/6/26  
Engrossed
3/10/26  

Caption

Relating To The Disclosure Of Intimate Images.

Impact

If enacted, this legislation will amend the Hawaii Revised Statutes to add a chapter dedicated to the unauthorized disclosure of intimate images. It mandates that depicted individuals who suffer harm due to such unauthorized disclosures can sue the responsible parties for damages. The proposed legislation creates a defined cause of action that may include claims for emotional distress, economic losses, and statutory damages. Importantly, the law would include specific provisions to protect the privacy of the plaintiffs during legal proceedings.

Summary

Senate Bill 2448, known as the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act, seeks to establish civil remedies for individuals whose intimate images have been disclosed without their consent. The bill explicitly defines 'intimate images' and outlines the rights of depicted individuals, which include the ability to pursue legal action against individuals who disclose their private images intentionally or recklessly. Overall, SB2448 aims to protect personal privacy and provide individuals with recourse against unauthorized disclosures of sensitive visual content.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB2448 appears to be supportive among advocates for individual privacy rights and those concerned about the digital exploitation of personal images. Advocates argue that the bill will help deter malicious acts of non-consensual sharing of intimate images and empower victims to seek justice. However, there may be concerns regarding the bill's implications on freedom of expression and legal ambiguities surrounding consent, especially in cases where images were previously shared consensually.

Contention

Despite widespread support, SB2448 has encountered contention over how 'consent' is defined in the context of image disclosure. Critics argue that the vague language could lead to unintended consequences where individuals may be unfairly penalized for sharing images in social contexts. Additionally, discussions point towards the implications for law enforcement and the legal system regarding the handling of such sensitive cases, particularly when it involves minors or deceased individuals. As the legislation progresses, stakeholders will need to navigate these complexities to ensure a balanced approach to privacy and expression.

Companion Bills

HI HB1682

Same As Relating To The Disclosure Of Intimate Images.

Previously Filed As

HI SB1156

Relating To Deepfakes.

HI SB694

Relating To The Detention Of Minors.

HI HB359

Relating To Covered Offender Registration.

HI HB602

Relating To The Medical Use Of Cannabis.

HI HB1390

Relating To The Medical Use Of Cannabis.

HI SB1569

Relating To Sports Wagering.

HI SB1449

Relating To Prior Authorization Of Health Care Services.

HI SB1579

Relating To Pharmacists.

HI HB896

Relating To Sexual Offenses.

HI HB1501

Relating To Trees.

Similar Bills

HI HB1682

Relating To The Disclosure Of Intimate Images.

CA AB2520

Business records: disclosure.

HI SB2248

Relating To Financial Disclosures.

CA AB950

An act to amend Sections 84502, 84503, 84504.

AZ HB2209

Health boards; retaliation; prohibition

HI SB2135

Relating To Privacy.

FL S0964

Financial Disclosures

CO SB288

Intimate Digital Depictions Criminal & Civil Actions