Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2114

Introduced
1/21/26  
Refer
1/22/26  
Report Pass
2/6/26  
Refer
2/6/26  
Report Pass
3/6/26  
Engrossed
3/10/26  
Refer
3/12/26  
Report Pass
3/24/26  

Caption

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

Impact

The passing of SB2114 is likely to have significant implications for state employment laws, particularly those related to public sector employees. By allowing a broader range of employees to grieve disciplinary actions, it is anticipated that the bill will promote a more equitable workplace environment and mitigate the potential for unjust treatment. Public employers will need to adapt their grievance procedures to comply with the new requirements, thus potentially leading to changes in how disciplinary actions are handled across the state.

Summary

SB2114 proposes amendments to the collective bargaining laws in Hawaii, specifically addressing grievance procedures for public employees. The bill aims to repeal the prohibition against certain exempt employees grieving disciplinary actions such as suspensions and discharges. Under the new provisions, any employee who is part of an appropriate bargaining unit will have the right to challenge disciplinary actions unless explicitly restricted by their collective bargaining agreement. This change is intended to enhance employee rights and ensure fair treatment in disciplinary matters.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment surrounding SB2114 appears to be supportive among labor advocates and employee rights groups, who view the bill as a positive step toward protecting workers' rights. However, some concerns have been raised by public employers regarding the implications this could have on their ability to manage workforce discipline effectively. The nuanced debate reflects a balancing act between ensuring employee protections and maintaining organizational oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the extent to which the bill will alter existing disciplinary frameworks. Opponents argue that easing grievance procedures could lead to an influx of challenges that might overwhelm existing administrative structures intended to handle disciplinary matters. Supporters counter that enhanced grievance rights are essential for accountability and fairness, arguing that a transparent process will lead to better workplace morale and trust in public institutions.

Companion Bills

HI HB1659

Same As Relating To Collective Bargaining.

Previously Filed As

HI SB717

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI HB161

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI SB340

Relating To Collective Bargaining In Public Employment.

HI HB162

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI SB337

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI SB1523

Relating To Private Sector Collective Bargaining Rights.

HI HB173

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI HB931

Relating To Private Sector Collective Bargaining Rights.

HI SB1469

Relating To Tax Collections.

HI SB183

Relating To The Hawaii Employer-union Health Benefits Trust Fund.

Similar Bills

HI HB1659

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI SB717

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI HB161

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI SB717

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

HI HB161

Relating To Collective Bargaining.

DC PR26-0302

Compensation and Working Conditions Agreement between the District of Columbia Government and the Fraternal Order of Police – Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee Emergency Approval Resolution of 2025

IA SF346

A bill for an act relating to procedures for grievances under the merit system for state employees.

HI HB2271

Making Emergency Appropriations For Public Employment Cost Items.