Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB2024

Introduced
1/21/26  
Refer
1/22/26  
Report Pass
2/12/26  
Refer
2/12/26  
Report Pass
3/6/26  
Engrossed
3/10/26  
Refer
3/12/26  
Report Pass
3/24/26  
Refer
3/24/26  

Caption

Relating To Charter School Facilities.

Impact

The implementation of SB2024 is expected to significantly impact state law by giving the School Facilities Authority more freedom to partner with private entities, which may lead to faster and more efficient development of new schools. The bill calls for a pilot program to establish three new public schools in areas identified as in need, highlighting the state’s intention to leverage external resources to enhance public education facilities. It responds to the urgent community needs amidst economic uncertainties, aiming for effective stewardship of public resources.

Summary

SB2024, titled 'Relating to Charter School Facilities', aims to address the growing need for public school facilities in Hawaii by utilizing public-private partnerships. The bill seeks to authorize the School Facilities Authority to enter partnerships for the design, financing, maintenance, or development of school facilities on privately-owned land. This legislative measure recognizes the high public school construction costs in Hawaii and the challenges in meeting the facility needs due to increasing enrollment and regional growth.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB2024 appears positive, especially among proponents who view this as a step towards innovation in educational facility development. Supporters argue that public-private partnerships can lead to cost efficiencies and timely solutions for overcrowding issues in schools. However, the bill's passage may also bring forth concerns regarding the implications of privatization in public education, underscoring a natural tension between ensuring quality education and relying on private interests.

Contention

Despite the potential benefits, there are points of contention, particularly regarding the parameters of the pilot program and where new schools can be developed. The bill prohibits the establishment of such schools on Department of Education-controlled lands, which raises questions about accessibility and equity. Critics may argue that limiting these developments could lead to disparities in educational access, thus necessitating careful consideration in the execution of the pilot program and its long-term viability.

Companion Bills

HI HB1783

Same As Relating To Charter School Facilities.

Previously Filed As

HI HB329

Relating To The School Facilities Authority.

HI HB904

Relating To Charter Schools.

HI SB494

Relating To Charter Schools.

HI HB1494

Relating To Sports Facilities.

HI SB580

Relating To The School Facilities Authority.

HI SB438

Relating To Waste Disposal Facilities.

HI HB901

Relating To Public Charter Schools.

HI SB1073

Relating To Charter Schools.

HI SB549

Relating To School Meals.

HI SB753

Relating To The School Facilities Authority.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

TX HB1615

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

TX HB1620

Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.

CA AB26

Eliminate the Politicians’ Perks Act of 2025.

NJ S1701

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.