Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB1316

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
1/27/25  
Report Pass
2/14/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/18/25  
Refer
3/18/25  

Caption

Relating To Court-ordered Payments.

Impact

With the implementation of SB1316, the procedure for collecting unpaid monetary obligations stemming from court orders will become more stringent. The bill requires the Judiciary to hold annual compliance hearings for defendants who fail to meet their payment responsibilities and to seek payment from collection agencies in cases of noncompliance. By prioritizing restitution payments, the legislation aims to ensure that victims of crimes receive compensation before fees and fines are collected by the state, reflecting a tilt towards protecting victims' rights.

Summary

Senate Bill 1316 addresses the collection of delinquent court-ordered payments, such as fees, fines, and restitution in the State of Hawaii. The legislation mandates that the Judiciary contract with a collection agency or a licensed attorney to recover these delinquent payments, thereby repealing previous authorizations for collecting delinquent restitution specifically. The bill outlines the responsibilities of the courts in conducting compliance hearings and establishes a structure for how payments are to be managed, ensuring that restitution has priority over other fees and fines.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1316 appears to be generally supportive among legislators focused on victims' rights and effective collection of court-ordered payments. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential for increased pressure on defendants who may already be struggling to meet their financial obligations. Critics worry that the bill could disadvantage those facing economic hardships, potentially leading to further legal repercussions for non-payment, such as imprisonment for noncompliance.

Contention

Key points of contention in the discussions surrounding SB1316 include the appropriate balance between ensuring victims are compensated and protecting defendants from harsh penalties related to nonpayment. The bill's provisions allowing for commitment due to nonpayment raise questions about fairness and the socio-economic implications for defendants. Advocates for reform suggest that while collecting owed payments is vital, there should be safeguards to prevent excessive penalties and make provisions for affordability in payment plans.

Companion Bills

HI HB997

Same As Relating To Court-ordered Payments.

HI SB1316

Carry Over Relating To Court-ordered Payments.

Previously Filed As

HI SB1316

Relating To Court-ordered Payments.

HI HB997

Relating To Court-ordered Payments.

HI SB276

Relating To Orders For Protection.

HI SB94

Relating To Temporary Restraining Orders.

HI SB477

Relating To Domestic Abuse Protective Orders.

HI SB461

Relating To Wages.

HI SB295

Relating To Domestic Abuse Protective Orders.

HI SB1454

Relating To The Wage And Hour Law.

HI SB356

Relating To Driving Under The Influence.

HI SB361

Relating To The Community Outreach Court.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1189

Criminal restitution orders; interest

TX SB1666

Relating to the payment of restitution.

AL HB559

Fraud victims compensation; Market Accountability Compensation Fund, established to provide restitution assistance to victims of investment fraud

MS HB54

Court-ordered restitution; require payment to victim first before court costs/fines are disbursed.

MS HB615

Court-ordered restitution; require payment to victim first before court costs/fines are disbursed.

HI HB573

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI HB573

Relating To Consumer Protection.

AZ HB2825

fines; fees; assessments; restitution; nonpayment