Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB106

Introduced
1/15/25  
Refer
1/16/25  
Report Pass
2/10/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/20/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
4/4/25  

Caption

Relating To Pedestrians.

Impact

If enacted, the bill will modify existing traffic safety laws in Hawaii, ensuring that pedestrians are not penalized for crossing outside marked crosswalks under specific conditions. Counties will have the option to participate or opt out based on their unique traffic conditions. The bill requires the Department of Transportation and law enforcement agencies to create clear enforcement guidelines as well as to analyze the pilot program's impact through data collection and assessment, thus fostering more tailored approaches to pedestrian safety across different jurisdictions.

Summary

SB106 aims to enhance pedestrian safety in Hawaii through the establishment of a three-year pilot program targeting counties with populations of two hundred fifty thousand or less. The initiative seeks to allow pedestrians to cross outside of designated crosswalks without facing penalties, provided they are at least two hundred feet from the nearest crosswalk and can determine there is no immediate danger of a collision. The bill recognizes the increasing necessity for pedestrian mobility as an integral part of a sustainable transportation system while aiming to balance freedom with safety measures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB106 appears to be mixed. Proponents of the bill, including many state legislators and transportation advocates, perceive it as a necessary step towards promoting pedestrian rights and public health by encouraging alternative, eco-friendly transportation modes. However, there are concerns raised by some members of the public and local officials who worry that relaxing restrictions on pedestrian crossing could lead to increased accidents and create challenges in managing pedestrian and vehicle interactions.

Contention

Notable points of contention mainly revolve around public safety versus pedestrian freedoms. While supporters argue that the bill addresses significant safety concerns by formalizing guidelines for the pilot program, opponents caution that it might inadvertently prioritize pedestrian convenience over road safety, particularly in high-traffic areas. Furthermore, the state's authority to revoke the pilot program statewide raises additional concerns among counties regarding local autonomy and decision-making regarding transportation safety measures.

Companion Bills

HI SB106

Carry Over Relating To Pedestrians.

Previously Filed As

HI SB106

Relating To Pedestrians.

HI HB941

Relating To Pedestrians.

HI HB1286

Relating To Pedestrian Safety.

HI SB1195

Relating To Transportation.

HI HCR112

Strongly Urging The Honolulu City Council To Adopt A "pedestrian First" Policy Via Ordinance.

HI SB1667

Relating To Transportation.

HI HCR136

Urging The City And County Of Honolulu To Encourage Pedestrians To Wear Reflective Gear Between The Hours Of Dusk And Dawn.

HI HR130

Urging The City And County Of Honolulu To Encourage Pedestrians To Wear Reflective Gear Between The Hours Of Dusk And Dawn.

HI HB1471

Relating To Transportation.

HI SB1666

Relating To Transportation.

Similar Bills

HI SB2470

Relating To Transportation.

HI HB1884

Relating To Transportation.

HI SB106

Relating To Pedestrians.

CA SB671

An act to amend Section 21450.

HI HB1471

Relating To Transportation.

HI HB1523

Relating To The Statewide Traffic Code.

HI HB2186

Relating To Pedestrian Safety.

HI SB2695

Relating To Pedestrian Safety.