Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii Senate Bill SB1035

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/23/25  
Report Pass
2/14/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Report Pass
2/28/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Report Pass
3/21/25  
Refer
3/21/25  

Caption

Relating To Consumer Protection.

Impact

If enacted, SB1035 will amend Chapter 481B of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, making it an unfair or deceptive act for any business to omit clear disclosure of the total price for live-event tickets and short-term lodging. The bill mandates that the total price must be displayed prominently and includes specific requirements for disclosing any additional fees before a consumer consents to the transaction. This change is expected to empower consumers by providing them a more accurate view of their potential expenditures, thereby enhancing transparency in pricing across these sectors.

Summary

Senate Bill 1035 is aimed at enhancing consumer protection in Hawaii by addressing the prevalent issue of undisclosed fees related to live-event tickets and short-term lodging. This bill seeks to prohibit businesses from advertising prices without clearly disclosing the total costs, including any additional mandatory fees. The legislation is a response to the growing trend of 'drip pricing', where the final price of a service or product increases significantly due to extra fees that are not disclosed upfront. This has become a pressing concern as consumers often face unexpected charges that impede their financial planning and purchasing decisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1035 appears to be predominantly favorable among consumer advocacy groups. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward combating deceptive pricing tactics that exploit consumers, especially in sectors that significantly impact everyday spending. However, there may be opposition from businesses that rely on variable pricing strategies, as they might view the regulations as overly restrictive and potentially damaging to their operational flexibility. Overall, the bill has garnered attention as a means to improve consumer trust in the marketplace.

Contention

Notably, one point of contention surrounding SB1035 relates to the balance between consumer protection and business flexibility. Critics may argue that stringent disclosure requirements could hinder competitive pricing and limit promotional strategies used by businesses, while supporters assert that transparency should take precedence to protect consumers from practices perceived as deceitful. The implementation of this bill could set a precedent for similar consumer protection laws in other sectors, potentially reshaping the landscape of consumer-business interactions in Hawaii.

Companion Bills

HI SB1035

Carry Over Relating To Consumer Protection.

Previously Filed As

HI SB1035

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB354

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI HB321

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB50

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB355

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB985

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB1160

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB1280

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB1162

Relating To Consumer Protection.

HI SB1037

Relating To Consumer Data Protection.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.