Hawaii House Bill HR10

Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/26
• Refer: 3/10/26

Caption

Requesting The Attorney General To Conduct A Comprehensive Review Of The Hawaii Revised Statutes To Identify Provisions In Which The Term "impaired" Or A Similar Term Is Used To Describe A Person With A Disability And To Suggest Disability-inclusive Appropriate Amendments.

Impact

If enacted, HR10 will lead to significant changes in the language used within state statutes regarding disabilities. Specifically, the resolution calls for the replacement of terms such as 'hearing impaired' with 'deaf or hard of hearing' and 'vision impaired' with 'low vision'. This change is aligned with contemporary standards in disability advocacy, which prioritize person-first language that is affirming and respectful. The bill intends to ensure that Hawaii's laws reflect modern understanding and sensitivity towards disabilities, thereby encouraging the inclusion of diverse identities and experiences.

Summary

House Resolution 10 (HR10) requests the Attorney General of Hawaii to conduct a comprehensive review of the Hawaii Revised Statutes to identify provisions that designate individuals with disabilities using terms like 'impaired'. The resolution aims to modernize and destigmatize such terminologies that have developed negative connotations over time. It underlines the importance of using respectful language that reflects the dignity and identity of individuals, moving towards more inclusive terminology within state laws.

Contention

While HR10 primarily seeks to modernize language, potential contention may arise from stakeholders who are resistant to altering established legal terms. Some may argue that these changes could create confusion or imply that the essence of legal definitions is being compromised. Moreover, there's a possibility that differing opinions may emerge within the disability advocacy community regarding the best approach to represent individuals with disabilities in legislation. The importance of maintaining the effectiveness of the law while updating its language is a core consideration that might lead to debates during the review process.