Urging The Prohibition Of The Use Of "excited Delirium", Or Similar Pseudoscientific Concepts, As A Medical Diagnosis, Cause Of Death, Or Legal Theory In The State Of Hawaii.
Impact
The resolution seeks to address the misuse of 'excited delirium' which has been implicated in legal outcomes that potentially obscure true causes of death during law enforcement interactions and undermine justice for affected individuals. With 'excited delirium' not being included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the bill advocates for medical determinations and legal proceedings to be based on scientifically validated principles. This shift would help in developing a more accountable legal framework, minimizing reliance on discredited concepts that can endanger lives and hinder justice.
Summary
HCR146 urges the prohibition of the use of 'excited delirium' or similar pseudoscientific concepts in the State of Hawaii as medical diagnoses, causes of death, or legal theories. The resolution comes amid findings from multiple legislative committees that 'excited delirium' lacks a basis in accepted medical science, is not a recognized diagnosis by major medical organizations, and fails to adhere to established diagnostic criteria. This concept has been used historically to justify the use of force by law enforcement, especially in incidents involving individuals who are experiencing mental health crises, often disproportionately affecting communities of color.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HCR146 appears to be supportive among legislators and advocacy groups who argue for the protection of human rights and the need for scientific integrity in legal and medical determinations. While there may be some opposition from those who defend the historical use of the concept, the prevailing view reflects a significant push towards accountability and modern, evidence-based practices. Overall, the atmosphere reflects a growing awareness of the necessity for reform in how mental health crises are addressed by law enforcement.
Contention
Notably, the resolution has been named 'The Haleck Resolution' in honor of Sheldon Haleck, a veteran whose case exemplified the problematic use of 'excited delirium' in legal contexts. This points to a broader discussion of racial and systemic injustices in legal proceedings involving law enforcement's treatment of individuals with mental health issues. Should HCR146 be enacted, it would prohibit the advancement of 'excited delirium' as a credible cause in medical or legal assessments, allowing for a reevaluation of past cases and the fostering of more accurate and humane responses to mental health emergencies.
Same As
Urging The Prohibition Of The Use Of "excited Delirium", Or Similar Pseudoscientific Concepts, As A Medical Diagnosis, Cause Of Death, Or Legal Theory In The State Of Hawaii.
Requesting The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs To Convene A Working Group To Examine And Consider The Transfer Of Native Hawaiian Burial Site Management Under Chapter 6e, Hawaii Revised Statutes, From The State Historic Preservation Division To The Office Of Hawaiian Affairs.
Encouraging The Kawaihuelani Center For Hawaiian Language Of The University Of Hawaii At Manoa To Further Provide Learning Resources And Opportunities That Promote Hawaiian Language And Culture.
Requesting The Governor To Increase Knowledge And Use Of Native Hawaiian Concepts And Practices On Health And Well-being In The State Council On Mental Health.
Requesting The Governor To Increase Knowledge And Use Of Native Hawaiian Concepts And Practices On Health And Well-being In The State Council On Mental Health.
Urging The Department Of Transportation To Establish A Working Group On Lowering The Legal Limit Of Blood Alcohol Concentration To 0.05 Grams Of Alcohol Per One Hundred Milliliters Of Blood With The Intent Of Prioritizing Safety And Saving Lives On Hawaii's Roads.
Urging The Prohibition Of The Use Of "excited Delirium", Or Similar Pseudoscientific Concepts, As A Medical Diagnosis, Cause Of Death, Or Legal Theory In The State Of Hawaii.