Hawaii 2026 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB332

Introduced
1/17/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/14/25  

Caption

Relating To Recycling.

Impact

By mandating a structured approach to lithium-ion battery disposal, HB332 is likely to enhance state laws surrounding waste management and environmental safety. It stipulates that the working group will analyze the sources and estimated quantities of lithium-ion batteries present in the state, as well as assess the environmental threats posed by their improper disposal. The involvement of various stakeholders, including battery manufacturers and recycling companies, ensures a collaborative approach that seeks to hold producers more accountable for their products. This could potentially lead to legislative proposals aimed at improving recycling rates and reducing landfill waste.

Summary

House Bill 332 (HB332) addresses the rising issue of improper disposal of lithium-ion batteries in the state of Hawaii. The bill highlights the significant environmental and safety hazards posed by these batteries, particularly in light of incidents such as a severe fire linked to lithium-ion batteries in California. The bill intends to establish a lithium-ion battery recycling working group within the Department of Health, focused on assessing effective recycling methods for small and medium format lithium-ion batteries. The establishment of this working group is aimed at mitigating risks associated with improper disposal, which affects not only environmental health but also public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB332 appears to be largely supportive, given the increasing recognition of environmental safety concerns linked to battery disposal. Stakeholders in the environmental sector and local communities are likely to view the bill favorably as it seeks to provide solutions to a pressing issue. However, potential opposition may arise from members of the battery manufacturing industry, who may be apprehensive about the implications of added responsibilities and regulations pertaining to their products. Nevertheless, the overall discourse is tilted towards advocating responsible battery disposal and enhanced recycling methods.

Contention

While HB332 aims to build a framework for improved recycling of lithium-ion batteries, there may be contention concerning the specifics of producer responsibility and the extent to which lithium-ion battery manufacturers should contribute to recycling efforts. Some stakeholders might argue that the bill could lead to higher costs for producers, which could be passed on to consumers. Additionally, discussions may emerge about how effective the proposed recycling solutions will be and whether they adequately address the complexities surrounding battery disposal and recycling.

Companion Bills

HI HB332

Carry Over Relating To Recycling.

Previously Filed As

HI HB332

Relating To Recycling.

HI SB391

Relating To Recycling.

HI SB1298

Relating To Recycling.

HI HB906

Relating To Recycling.

HI SB987

Relating To Recycling.

HI HB242

Relating To Electric Vehicle Batteries.

HI SB103

Relating To Electric Vehicle Batteries.

HI SB1067

Relating To Deposit Beverage Container Recycling.

HI HB786

Relating To Deposit Beverage Container Recycling.

HI HB470

Relating To Noise.

Similar Bills

CA ACA2

Legislature: retirement.

CA SB699

Legislature: constitutional course.

MI HR0041

A resolution to direct the Clerk of the House of Representatives to only present to the Governor enrolled House bills finally passed by both houses of the One Hundred Third Legislature.

TX HB1615

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of certain local laws concerning water and wastewater special districts, including a conforming amendment.

AK SCR1

Art. Ii, Sec. 16, Const: Veto Recon

TX HB1620

Relating to nonsubstantive additions to, revisions of, and corrections in enacted codes, to the nonsubstantive codification or disposition of various laws omitted from enacted codes, and to conforming codifications enacted by the 88th Legislature to other Acts of that legislature.

CA AB26

Eliminate the Politicians’ Perks Act of 2025.

NJ S1701

Requires legislative approval of changes to core curriculum content standards and Statewide assessments.