If enacted, HB2223 would amend Hawaii Revised Statutes Section 6E-8, specifically changing the consultation requirements and allowing DHHL to perform its reviews. The bill also appropriates $400,000 for the establishment of new positions, including a historic preservation specialist, archaeologist, architectural historian, and cultural historian. This funding aims to bolster the Department’s capability in making informed decisions regarding historic preservation and related projects, thereby reinforcing state efforts to protect historic properties while supporting DHHL's governance.
Summary
House Bill 2223 aims to enhance the efficiency of historic preservation reviews by permitting the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) to conduct its own assessments of proposed projects that may affect historic properties and burial sites on lands under its jurisdiction. Currently, projects are required to consult with the Department of Land and Natural Resources before commencing any work, potentially leading to delays in project approvals. This bill seeks to streamline the process, allowing specialized personnel within DHHL to review project impacts directly and effectively manage these sensitive areas of cultural significance.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB2223 appears to be largely positive, especially among stakeholders who emphasize the importance of facilitating timely project approvals without compromising the integrity of historic preservation protocols. Proponents argue that this bill empowers the DHHL and trusts it to manage significant cultural resources effectively. However, some concerns have been raised about whether this change could lead to insufficient oversight if not carefully monitored, highlighting a tension between expedience and preservation.
Contention
Notable points of contention center around the adequacy of oversight that will follow the bill’s implementation. Critics worry that reducing the consultation obligation with the Department of Land and Natural Resources might risk undermining comprehensive assessments of potential impacts on historic and cultural sites if the DHHL does not have adequate oversight mechanisms in place. Furthermore, potential disagreements between the DHHL and island burial councils on projects affecting burial sites could pose challenges, necessitating that the specified consultations remain obligatory for sensitive projects.