Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

Hawaii House Bill HB991

Introduced
1/23/25  
Refer
1/23/25  
Report Pass
2/27/25  
Engrossed
3/4/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Enrolled
5/1/25  
Chaptered
5/27/25  

Caption

Relating To Criminal History Record Checks.

Impact

The enactment of HB 991 will directly affect the statutory framework governing the conduct of fingerprint-based background checks as established in the Hawaii Revised Statutes. By refining the definitions of who can be subjected to these checks, it reinforces the integrity of the personnel accessing sensitive federal tax data. The bill ensures that only qualified contractors, their employees, or subcontractors are subject to these safety protocols, thereby strengthening the security mechanisms in place to protect federal information under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General's office.

Summary

House Bill 991 aims to clarify and amend provisions regarding fingerprint-based criminal history record checks for individuals accessing federal tax information in Hawaii. This legislation emerges in response to federal regulatory requirements that necessitate a more precise definition of individuals subject to such background checks. Specifically, the bill removes the vague term 'agents of contractors' to ensure applicable employees and subcontractors who interact with federal tax information are adequately vetted through the designated security measures.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be supportive among legislative members focusing on security and compliance with federal requirements. The legislative discussions reflect an understanding of the need for specificity in regulations to meet federal obligations. However, concerns may arise regarding the broader implications of increased scrutiny on contractors and their employees, particularly about employment opportunities and privacy concerns, but these points have not dominated the discourse.

Contention

A potential point of contention could arise from the implications of increased security clearance processes, which some stakeholders may view as excessive or an impediment to hiring practices in the private sector. However, proponents emphasize the necessity of such measures in safeguarding sensitive information, highlighting that the amendment is aimed at preventing any unauthorized access that may compromise the integrity of federal tax information. The balance between ensuring security and maintaining efficient contractor operations may lead to future debates on the adequacy of such regulatory measures.

Companion Bills

HI SB1310

Same As Relating To Criminal History Record Checks.

Similar Bills

MI HB4384

State management: purchasing; awarding contracts to entities that donate or contribute to certain political candidates or committees; prohibit. Amends 1984 PA 431 (MCL 18.1101 - 18.1594) by adding sec. 264b.

CT SB00953

An Act Redefining "state Contractor", "prospective State Contractor" And "subcontractor" To Exclude Statutorily Recognized Indian Tribes Of This State For Purposes Of Campaign Finance Laws.

CT SB00604

An Act Redefining "state Contractor", "prospective State Contractor" And "subcontractor" For Purposes Of The Campaign Finance Laws.

MI HB4383

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; certain donations by a contractor or prospective contractor under state contract; prohibit. Amends 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.201 - 169.282) by adding sec. 30a.

HI SB1310

Relating To Criminal History Record Checks.

HI SB1310

Relating To Criminal History Record Checks.

CT HB05546

An Act Concerning Campaign Finance Laws, Statutorily Recognized Indigenous Tribes And Security For Candidates, Their Families And Their Campaign Staffs.

NV AB551

Requires a background investigation of employees, prospective employees, contractors and prospective contractors of certain governmental agencies. (BDR 38-1122)