Hawaii House Bill HB800

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Refer: 1/21/25
• Report Pass: 2/13/25
• Refer: 2/13/25
• Report Pass: 2/28/25
• Engrossed: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Report Pass: 3/21/25
• Refer: 3/21/25
• Report Pass: 4/4/25
• Report Pass: 4/25/25
• Enrolled: 5/1/25
• Chaptered: 7/3/25
• Passed: 7/3/25

Caption

Relating To Government.

Impact

This legislation aims to clarify ownership and management of certain public lands, which could streamline administrative processes between state and local government operations. By transferring these parcels to the City and County of Honolulu, this bill seeks to enhance local control over land management and clarify the roles of state agencies involved. However, the bill also includes provisions that exempt these lands from being defined as public lands under existing statutes, potentially reducing the state's direct oversight of these properties in the future.

Summary

House Bill 800 (HB800), introduced in the 33rd Legislature of Hawaii, proposes to transfer the fee simple interest in several parcels of land from various state agencies to the City and County of Honolulu. The bill specifically outlines the properties being conveyed, including locations such as the Liliha Civic Center and the Iwilei Fire Station. The parcels will be transferred 'as is', with all existing improvements and encumbrances, meaning that the City will accept the properties in their current condition, with no stipulation for modifications or repairs by the state prior to the transfer.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB800 appears to be generally supportive among local government officials who favor greater local autonomy over land management. Supporters argue that this transfer will allow the City and County to more effectively manage local services and resources. However, there may be concerns from some stakeholders about how this shift in property management may affect state oversight and environmental regulations associated with these lands.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the exemption of transferred lands from the public land trust definition. Critics may argue that this could lead to reduced accountability and oversight regarding the treatment of these parcels from a state perspective. Opponents may fear that the change in ownership could impact public access and land use regulations that were originally designed to protect community interests.