Hawaii House Bill HB1143

Hawaii 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 1/23/25
• Report Pass: 2/11/25
• Refer: 2/11/25

Caption

Relating To A State Historic Preservation Income Tax Credit.

Impact

The bill's implementation is expected to have a positive impact on state laws regarding historic preservation. It facilitates economic development by encouraging rehabilitation projects and is expected to lead to an increase in the restoration of historical sites across Hawaii. The bill also sets specific guidelines on how these tax credits can be claimed, including a requirement for taxpayers to provide detailed documentation of their expenditures. This structured approach will help ensure accountability and effective use of the tax credit, promoting transparency in the rehabilitation process.

Summary

House Bill 1143 seeks to reestablish the State Historic Preservation Income Tax Credit aimed at encouraging the rehabilitation of certified historic structures. The proposed bill allows taxpayers to claim a tax credit of 30% for substantial rehabilitation of such structures, which is intended to incentivize property owners to invest in restoring and maintaining these significant buildings. The bill introduces a structured mechanism for tax credits that varies based on the project phase, ensuring the tax benefits are realized only when buildings are placed into service, with provisions for certification and verification by state authorities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 1143 appears to be favorable among preservationists and local developers who see the value in restoring cultural heritage sites. Supporters emphasize the significance of maintaining historical character while providing economic opportunities through tourism and local commerce. However, some concerns were raised regarding the limits on the amount of tax credits which may restrict some small-scale projects, reflecting the need for careful balance between encouraging investment and protecting state revenues.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves the timeframes set for the funding and claiming of tax credits, particularly the sunset clause which repeals the credit at the end of 2030. Critics argue that this may not provide sufficient long-term assurance for property owners to embark on substantial rehabilitation projects. Moreover, the requirement for projects to meet specific rehabilitation standards may also pose challenges for smaller developers who might lack the necessary expertise or financial resources to comply with the strict criteria set forth in the bill.