District Of Columbia 2025-2026 Regular Session

District Of Columbia Council Bill B26-0327

Introduced
7/11/25  
Refer
7/14/25  
Engrossed
3/3/26  
Report Pass
3/27/26  
Enrolled
4/13/26  

Caption

Schools First Amendment Act of 2025

Impact

The primary impact of B26-0327 is its potential to alter how schools within DCPS allocate funds based on projected costs associated with staffing. Supporters argue that the updated calculation method will lead to more equitable funding distribution among schools, particularly those with higher staffing costs. The fiscal impact statement adopted by the Council reflects this as a positive step toward addressing budgetary discrepancies that may arise from varied personnel needs across schools.

Summary

B26-0327, known as the Schools First Amendment Act of 2025, is designed to amend the Schools First in Budgeting Amendment Act of 2022, specifically concerning the methodology for calculating individual school budgets within the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) system. The bill introduces a new factor—average position cost—which accounts for the overall cost of school-based educators, including salaries and benefits, when determining each school's annual budget for the upcoming fiscal year. This change aims to provide a more accurate reflection of personnel costs in the budgeting process.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive among education advocates and stakeholders in the DCPS community. Many participants in discussions have noted that this reform is overdue and necessary for crafting budgets that genuinely meet the operational needs of schools. However, there may be some contention over how the average position cost is calculated and its implementation in varying school contexts, as this could lead to shifts in funding that some schools may not favor.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the formula used to calculate the average position cost and whether it sufficiently addresses the specific needs of schools serving disadvantaged student populations. While the bill is expected to enhance the budgeting process, opponents might argue that it doesn't adequately consider local factors such as student enrollment fluctuations and varying community needs, which could lead to unforeseen disparities in funding.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

DC B26-0068

Universal Out of School Time Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0109

Farmers Market Support Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0531

Urban Agriculture Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0187

Metropolitan Police Department Training Academy College Credit Opportunity Amendment Act of 2025 (now known as "Peace DC Omnibus Amendment Act of 2025")

DC B26-0461

Juvenile Curfew Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0053

Vacant to Vibrant to Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0249

Nonprofit Services Preservation Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0332

Vending Modernization Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0305

Peace DC Omnibus Temporary Amendment Act of 2025

DC B26-0304

Peace DC Omnibus Emergency Amendment Act of 2025

Similar Bills

CA ACA1

Public finance.

CA AB1062

Local control funding formula: concentration grants: charter schools: waiver.

CA AB1204

Local control funding formula: school districts and charter schools: pupils experiencing homelessness: supplemental and concentration grants: regional adjustment factors: grade-span adequacy adjustments.

CA SB788

An act to amend Section 22258 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to business.

AK SB278

Local Contributions By School Districts

CA AB2526

Special education local plan areas: apportionments: alternate assessments.

AZ HB2507

School districts; expenditure limitation

AZ SB1038

Aggravated assault; commission; certain officials