Connecticut 2026 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05387

Introduced
2/26/26  
Refer
2/26/26  
Report Pass
3/12/26  
Refer
3/23/26  

Caption

An Act Concerning Disclosure Of Wage Ranges And Benefits On Public And Internal Job Advertisements.

Impact

The impact of HB 05387 is expected to improve fairness in the workplace by promoting open discussions about wages amongst employees and potential hires. By mandating transparency in wage disclosure, the bill seeks to address wage disparities and empower employees to negotiate better terms of employment. The legislation will also likely necessitate changes in employer hiring practices and could lead to a reduction in wage discrimination, aligning employee compensation more closely with market standards.

Summary

House Bill 05387 aims to enhance wage transparency in the hiring process by obligating employers to disclose wage ranges and benefits in public and internal job advertisements. As it updates existing laws, the bill prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who discuss their wages with one another. Additionally, employers are required to provide applicants with wage information upon their request or before making a compensation offer. The goal of this legislation is to foster an environment of transparency that allows employees to make informed decisions about their employment and compensation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be generally positive among advocates for employee rights and transparency. Supporters argue that it is a significant step toward dismantling barriers to wage equality and fostering a more fair workforce. However, there are concerns from some employers who fear that enforced transparency could create tension among employees or lead to unrealistic expectations about compensation. This divergence in views highlights the ongoing debate about the balance between employee rights and employer autonomy.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the potential backlash from employers who may feel that the bill overreaches into their operational discretion. Critics argue that mandating wage disclosures could stifle the flexibility that companies need to make competitive employment offers. The bill's requirement to disclose salary history upon request may also raise concerns around privacy and the potential for employers to use wage history as a tool to perpetuate existing wage gaps. Overall, these tensions illustrate the complex balancing act of promoting transparency while respecting employer discretion.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB06517

An Act Concerning Disclosures Of Salary Ranges On Public And Internal Job Postings.

CT SB01036

An Act Establishing Disclosures For Job Postings And Employees.

CT HB06561

An Act Requiring Side Effect Disclosures On State-funded Advertisements For Vaccines.

CT SB01464

An Act Concerning Sports Wagering And Multijurisdictional Internet Gaming.

CT HB07207

An Act Concerning The Disclosure Of Insurer Reports Concerning Treatment Limitations On Mental Health And Substance Use Disorder And Other Benefits As A Public Record.

CT HB07268

An Act Concerning The Jobsct Tax Rebate Program.

CT HB05609

An Act Concerning Retirement Benefits And Workers' Compensation Benefits.

CT HB05776

An Act Concerning Wages And Salaries Of State Employees.

CT HB06412

An Act Concerning Prevailing Wage Rates On Public Works Contracts.

CT HB06955

An Act Concerning A Contractor's Responsibility For Unpaid Wages On A Construction Contract.

Similar Bills

AZ HB2361

Collective bargaining; warehouse employees; quotas

AZ HB2488

Collective bargaining; warehouse employees; quotas

AZ SB1465

Collective bargaining; warehouse employees; quotas

CT SB00436

An Act Concerning Advanced Notice Of An Employee's Work Schedule By An Employer.

CT SB00831

An Act Concerning Advanced Notice Of An Employee's Work Schedule To Certain Employees.

AZ SB1148

CORP; defined contributions

AZ HB2912

Employment; employee salary

CT SB00323

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Office Of State Ethics For Revisions To The State Codes Of Ethics.