Colorado 2026 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1070

Introduced
1/27/26  
Refer
1/27/26  
Report Pass
2/17/26  
Refer
2/17/26  
Engrossed
2/26/26  
Refer
2/26/26  
Report Pass
3/19/26  
Refer
3/19/26  
Engrossed
4/1/26  
Engrossed
4/1/26  
Enrolled
4/2/26  

Caption

Third-Party Network Agreements for Dental Services

Impact

If enacted, HB 1070 would significantly impact how dental providers negotiate contracts with insurance carriers and third-party entities. By mandating affirmative consent, the bill ensures that providers can make informed decisions regarding their business agreements, thus potentially reducing the influence of third parties in dental care contracts. This is aimed at protecting the providers' rights and maintaining the integrity of their client relationships, while also providing patients with clearer insights into who is managing their dental care costs and access.

Summary

House Bill 1070 is concerned with regulating third-party network lease agreements related to dental services in Colorado. The bill requires that carriers must obtain affirmative consent from dental providers before allowing third parties to access their services and the discounts agreed upon in their contracts. This measure aims to enhance transparency and ensure that dental providers retain control over who has access to their services and pricing agreements. It holds that a provider's refusal to allow such access should not be grounds for terminating their contract with the carrier.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 1070 reveal potential contention, particularly among those concerned about the balance of power between insurance carriers and dental providers. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to empower providers and protect them from potentially exploitative practices from third parties. Conversely, some stakeholders in the insurance and healthcare industry may oppose the legislation, fearing that the added requirements could limit accessibility to dental services or complicate contract negotiations, ultimately leading to higher costs for consumers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CO HB1329

Foreign Third-Party Litigation Financing

CO SB083

Limitations on Restrictive Employment Agreements

CO HB1088

Costs for Ground Ambulance Services

CO HB1033

Medicaid Third-Party Liability Payments

CO HB1019

Third-Party Administration of Division of Housing Programs

CO SB070

Online Marketplaces & Third-Party Sellers

CO HB1108

Prohibitions in Rental Agreements Due to Death

CO HB1291

Transportation Network Company Consumer Protection

CO SB194

Sunset Dental Practice Act

CO SB198

Transparency Transactions Medical Care Entities

Similar Bills

CA SB351

Health facilities.

CA SB1041

Voluntary contractual assessments: wildfire safety improvements.

CA SB1141

Public contracts: University of California executives: conflicts of interest: prohibition.

AL SB75

Public works contracts; exemption established for purchases made through cooperative purchasing agreements, requirements for certain public contracts to comply with applicable state or local competitive bid laws provided

CA AB2039

Attorneys.

CA AB2327

Medi-Cal: subcontractors: rates.

CA AB2305

Corporate investment in litigation practice.

CA SB791

Vehicle dealers: document processing charge.