Colorado 2025 Regular Session

Colorado House Bill HB1313

Introduced
3/31/25  
Refer
3/31/25  
Report Pass
4/14/25  
Refer
4/14/25  
Engrossed
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Engrossed
5/16/25  
Engrossed
5/16/25  
Enrolled
5/16/25  

Caption

Modify Laws Within Purview of the Capital Development Committee

Impact

The passage of HB 1313 is set to influence the state’s budgeting process and the operational protocols of capital construction projects. It will amend the Colorado Revised Statutes, specifically targeting sections related to contract management and the execution timelines for professional services contracts. One significant change is that contracts must be executed within a specified period following the appropriation of funds, facilitating quicker project initiation and updates to capital project timelines to better reflect fiscal challenges and realities.

Summary

House Bill 1313 seeks to modify existing laws within the purview of the Capital Development Committee, which oversees capital construction projects in the state. The bill aims to refine regulations regarding the execution and encumbrance of contracts for capital construction projects, ensuring timely completion and adherence to budgetary constraints. By adjusting the timelines for contract execution related to state-funded projects, the bill intends to enhance efficiency in the use of allocated funds for construction and renovation across state institutions.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 1313 have elicited a generally positive sentiment among legislators focused on streamlining state processes and improving the efficacy of capital project management. Supporters believe the bill represents a necessary reform to enhance the responsiveness of the state’s capital construction program. However, a few dissenting voices raised concerns regarding potential pitfalls in oversight and the risk of expedited procedures compromising quality or thoroughness in project execution.

Contention

Some points of contention involved the balance between efficiency and thoroughness in managing state-funded construction projects. Critics argumented that hastening contract processes could lead to oversight lapses or insufficient scrutiny on project expenditures. Furthermore, concerns were raised about how changes in budgeting priorities could impact equitable access to funding across varying state educational institutions and their construction needs. The bill's quickened timelines necessitate careful consideration of appropriate checks to ensure that standards are upheld while still promoting efficient project execution.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR HB1573

To Reorganize The Standing Committees And The Subject Matter Interim Committees Of The House Of Representatives.

CA AB1350

Employment Development Department: policies and practices.

DE SR8

Relating To The Delaware State Senate Rules Of Procedure For Ethics Violations.

CA SB829

California Institute for Scientific Research: CalRx Initiative: vaccines.

DE HB5

An Act To Amend Title 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Legislative Oversight Of Agency Regulations.

CA SCR1

2025–26 First Extraordinary Session: Joint Rules.

CA SR4

An action whereby a bill has been passed or defeated may not be rescinded without the concurrence of 27 Members.

CA AB1789

Political Reform Act of 1974: candidate trainings.