Colorado 2025 1st Special Session

Colorado House Bill HB1002

Introduced
8/21/25  
Refer
8/21/25  
Report Pass
8/21/25  
Refer
8/21/25  
Engrossed
8/23/25  
Refer
8/23/25  
Report Pass
8/23/25  
Refer
8/23/25  
Engrossed
8/26/25  
Engrossed
8/26/25  
Enrolled
8/26/25  

Caption

Corporate Income Tax Foreign Jurisdictions

Impact

The legislation proposes to add foreign-derived deduction eligible income (FDDEI) back to taxable income for the state tax assessment starting from 2026. The goal of this addition is to promote tax compliance and fairness, ensuring that corporations doing business outside of Colorado don't disproportionately benefit from tax reductions at the expense of state resources. The assumption is that by requiring these corporations to account for their global income adequately, the state will see improved revenue collection, albeit the increase is defined as de minimis.

Summary

House Bill 1002 aims to address corporate income taxation related to foreign jurisdictions to decrease tax avoidance in Colorado. The bill continues existing tax policies while expanding the list of jurisdictions considered for tax purposes. It seeks to clarify which foreign jurisdictions are utilized by C corporations for tax avoidance, thus creating a more accurate representation of entities that might otherwise escape fair taxation. This clarification is intended to combat tax loopholes exploited by companies for financial benefit, ensuring that they contribute adequately to state revenues.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding HB 1002 is largely positive among proponents who believe that it will tighten tax laws and enhance equity among businesses operating in Colorado. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a necessary adjustment to align state tax policy with federal changes and to reduce instances of corporate tax avoidance. However, skepticism exists among some stakeholders who may perceive additional guidelines as overly burdensome or fear that such regulations could harm business competitiveness in the region.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 1002 include the balance between vigilant tax enforcement and maintaining an attractive business environment. While supporters advocate for stricter measures against tax avoidance, critics express concern about potential overreach that could deter corporations from establishing or retaining operations in Colorado. The bill represents a significant shift in recognizing the need for transparency in corporate taxation while navigating the fine line between state interests and business autonomy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CO SB138

Permanent Reductions to State Income Tax

CO HB1329

Foreign Third-Party Litigation Financing

CO HB1012

Income Tax Expenditures for Service Members

CO HB1037

Income Tax Credit for Eligible Teachers

CO SB026

Adjusting Certain Tax Expenditures

CO SB319

Modification Higher Education Expenses Income Tax Incentive

CO HB1139

Income Tax Credit for Eligible Veterans

CO SB013

Senior Housing Income Tax Credit Extension

CO HB1128

Income Tax Credit for Firearm Safety Device

CO HB1045

Modify Long-Term Care Insurance Income Tax Credit

Similar Bills

CA AB2147

Criminal procedure: jurisdiction of public offenses.

CA SB1216

Planning and Zoning Law: housing leadership designation.

CA AB1583

Criminal procedure: jurisdiction.

CA AB70

Solid waste: organic waste: diversion: biomethane.

CA AB643

Climate change: short-lived climate pollutants: organic waste reduction.

FL S0502

Concurrent Legislative Jurisdiction over United States Military Installations

CA AB1708

Homeless Housing, Assistance, and Prevention program: round 8: smaller jurisdictions.

CA AB494

Nonminor dependents: transfer of county of residence.