California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB947

Introduced
2/2/26  
Refer
2/18/26  
Refer
3/26/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/19/26  

Caption

Employment: automated decision systems.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state employment laws by establishing clearer guidelines on the acceptable use of algorithmically derived information in decisions concerning wages, promotions, and termination. It provides a framework for protecting employees from potential biases or misuses of technology in the workplace, addressing key concerns regarding fairness and equity in employment practices. The explicit enforcement mechanisms, which include civil penalties for violations, strengthen the rights of workers while potentially increasing employer accountability.

Summary

Senate Bill 947, introduced by Senator McNerney, aims to regulate the use of automated decision systems (ADS) in employment settings. The bill prohibits employers from solely relying on these systems for disciplinary or termination decisions, mandating that a human review corroborate any data-driven decisions impacting a worker's employment status. Additionally, it empowers workers to request their own data used in such decisions, thus promoting transparency and accountability in hiring and management practices involving technology.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 947 is notably supportive among labor rights advocates, who view it as a crucial step in safeguarding employee rights in an increasingly automated world. However, there are concerns about the potential burden it may place on employers, particularly small businesses, regarding compliance with these new provisions. The tension between the advancement of technology and the protection of individual rights underlines much of the discussion surrounding the bill, highlighting the need for balance in implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the bill's provisions against the use of customer ratings as a primary factor in employment decisions and the requirement for human oversight when employing ADS. Critics argue that these requirements may hamper efficiency and lead to complications in the hiring process, while supporters argue they are necessary to prevent discrimination and protect workers' rights. Additionally, the bill addresses issues surrounding privacy rights, mandating that any disclosed worker data be anonymized to protect individual identities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB7

Employment: automated decision systems.

CA SB430

Local agencies: automated decision systems.

CA SB1248

State agencies: automated decision systems.

CA SB00435

An Act Concerning Automated Decision Systems Protections For Employees.

CA SB719

Department of Technology: inventory: high-risk automated decision systems.

CA SB189

Automated Decision-Making Technology

CA SB274

Automated license plate recognition systems.

CA SB1444

Employment.

CA SB261

Division of Labor Standards Enforcement: orders, decisions, and awards.

CA AB288

Employment: labor organization and unfair practices.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.