California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB790

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/12/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Report Pass
5/5/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Refer
5/6/25  
Report Pass
5/5/25  
Report Pass
5/5/25  
Refer
5/6/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
5/6/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  
Refer
6/26/25  
Refer
6/26/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  

Caption

An act to amend Sections 94801.

Impact

The proposed legislation has significant implications for how distance education is regulated in California. If enacted, it would extend the regulatory framework provided by the California Private Postsecondary Education Act to include out-of-state institutions that do not have a physical presence in California. This means that such entities must comply with California's student protections and regulatory requirements, thus creating a more uniform standard for distance education programs within the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 790, introduced by Senator Cabaldon, aims to amend existing laws related to postsecondary education in California, specifically addressing the operation of out-of-state educational institutions offering distance education to California students. The bill authorizes the Governor to enter into interstate reciprocity agreements by January 1, 2028, allowing institutions outside California to operate within the state under a structured agreement. It requires designated state agencies to oversee these agreements and ensures that institutions comply with state education standards, thereby enhancing regulatory oversight.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 790 appears to be positive, with supporters emphasizing the potential for increased access to quality education from established institutions outside California. They argue that this could provide more educational options for students, particularly in a rapidly evolving digital landscape. However, there are some concerns regarding the enforceability of regulations and whether the bill sufficiently protects California students from potentially subpar educational offerings.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the mechanics of the interstate agreements and the extent to which California can enforce its educational standards on out-of-state institutions. Opponents may argue that while the bill aims at increasing access to education, it could inadvertently lower the quality and rigorousness of educational standards if not carefully regulated. Additionally, the impact on existing California institutions and their competitive edge is a concern that could lead to further debates in the legislative discussions surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB619

An act to amend Sections 48800, 66721.

CA AB123

An act to amend Sections 17201, 51225.

CA SB91

An act to amend Sections 15651 and 15672 Section 4005 of the Elections Code, relating to elections.

CA SB542

An act to amend Section Sections 8670.

CA AB537

An act to amend Sections 76396.

CA AB904

An act to amend Sections 10213.

CA AB824

An act to amend Sections 527.

CA AB143

An act to amend Sections 4511.

CA AB873

An act to amend Sections 1725, 1750, 1750.

CA AB1528

An act to amend Sections 10213.

Similar Bills

CT HB06445

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Office Of Higher Education, Expanding Dual Credit Opportunities And Concerning College Readiness And Remedial Support Programs At The Connecticut State Colleges And Universities And Information Reported To The Credential Database.

AZ SB1210

Private postsecondary education; nondomiciled institutions

AZ HB2954

Higher education; 2025-2026

AZ SB1497

School districts; insurance quotes

AZ SB1742

2025-2026; higher education

AZ SB1454

Subject matter expert certification

AZ SB1614

Athletic coaches; employment contracts; universities