California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB398

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/14/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/3/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/16/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  
Chaptered
10/2/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  
Passed
10/2/25  

Caption

Election crimes: payment based on voting or voter registration.

Impact

If enacted, SB 398 will significantly impact election laws in California by adding to the existing regulations surrounding voter registration and election-related crimes. The proposed law establishes severe penalties for those who attempt to influence voters with financial or other incentives, potentially leading to fines of up to $10,000 and imprisonment for up to three years. By creating this new crime, the bill is viewed as a proactive measure to curtail unethical practices in the electoral process, reinforcing the integrity of democratic participation among voters.

Summary

Senate Bill 398, introduced by Senator Umberg, addresses the issue of election integrity by criminalizing the practice of paying someone to influence their decision to vote or register to vote. The bill explicitly states that payment or other valuable consideration with the intent to induce voting or contingent upon a person’s voting or registration status is a crime. This legislation aims to deter practices that could lead to voter manipulation and ensure that elections are fair and free from coercion or bribery.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 398 is generally supportive among those advocating for fair elections and enhanced voter integrity. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to prevent manipulation and maintain public trust in the election process. However, some critics express concerns over the potential for overreach and the implications for organizations and individuals who may work to encourage voter participation, suggesting that educational incentives could be misconstrued as coercive under this law.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between preventing undue influence and allowing legitimate forms of voter outreach and assistance. Some legislators and advocacy groups question whether the bill's definitions are broad enough to inadvertently criminalize well-intentioned efforts to help citizens engage in the electoral process. There is also debate over the lack of required reimbursement for local agencies under this act, raising concerns about unfunded mandates in implementing new crime classifications, which could strain local resources.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA HB2007

Voter registrations; payment prohibited

CA AB808

Campaign statements and registrations: filing online or electronically.

CA HB43

Elections, Voting, Ballots

CA AB1764

Elections: voter registration.

CA SB335

Elections: voting by mail.

CA AB930

Elections and voting procedures.

CA HB63

School&election Bds; Voting; Elections

CA SB70

School&election Bds; Voting; Elections

CA AB1392

Elections: voter registration information: elected officials and candidates.

CA HB1036

To Amend The Law Concerning Voter Registration; To Allow Voter Registration During Early Voting And On Election Day; And To Amend Provisions Of Arkansas Constitution, Amendment 51.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.