California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB279

Introduced
 
Introduced
2/5/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Refer
5/12/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Refer
6/30/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Chaptered
10/11/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Passed
10/11/25  

Caption

Solid waste: compostable materials.

Impact

If passed, SB 279 would notably expand the permissible limits for composting materials at agricultural facilities. The revisions include increasing the total onsite compost and feedstock allowance to 200 cubic yards, or 500 cubic yards for activities owned by public agencies. Additionally, it permits the sale or donation of compostable products up to 5,000 cubic yards annually, significantly enhancing the operational capacity for compost activities and providing a framework for future regulatory adjustments by the department in response to industry needs.

Summary

Senate Bill 279, introduced by McNerney, addresses issues related to solid waste management, specifically in the context of compostable materials. The bill mandates the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery to revise regulations on composting to enhance standards while increasing flexibility for agricultural facilities. It aims to modify the criteria under which composting activities are exempt from permits, allowing greater quantities of compostable materials on site without heavy regulation, which is seen as a step forward for agricultural efficiency and waste management.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 279 is largely positive among proponents, particularly those in the agricultural sector, who argue that this bill facilitates improved management of organic waste and enhances sustainability in farming practices. Supporters feel that these changes can lead to economic benefits through operational efficiencies. However, there may also be concerns regarding environmental implications and the need for effective oversight, especially regarding the increased quantities allowed at composting operations.

Contention

While SB 279 streamlines composting regulations for agricultural operations, it could spark debate regarding the adequacy of oversight in managing potentially harmful waste materials. Critics may argue that relaxing rules too much could lead to environmental risks, decreasing local control over waste management practices. The definition and regulation of what constitutes compostable materials, particularly in large-scale operations, could lead to contention as stakeholders seek to find a balance between operational efficiency and potential environmental impacts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1812

Solid waste: compostable products.

CA SB1031

Solid waste: compostable products.

CA AB70

Solid waste: organic waste: diversion: biomethane.

CA HB06917

An Act Concerning The Management Of Solid Waste In The State.

CA AB643

Climate change: short-lived climate pollutants: organic waste reduction.

CA SB811

Hazardous materials: metal shredding facilities.

CA SB404

Hazardous materials: metal shredding facilities.

CA SB1230

Solid waste: illegal dumping: penalties: resources.

CA H4039

Solid Waste Disposal Facility in Broward County

CA AB2776

Hazardous materials: storage tanks.

Similar Bills

CO HB1270

Ownership of Agricultural Data

CA SB778

Migrant childcare and development programs.

AZ HB2717

Agricultural operations; energy projects; compensation

AZ HB2543

Agricultural lessees; energy projects; compensation

CA AB1486

Climate resiliency: research farms: grant program.

CA AR19

Relative to California Agriculture Day.

CA AB845

Employment: complaints: agricultural employees.

CA SR28

(2025-2026)