California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB19

Introduced
 
Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
1/29/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/11/25  
Chaptered
10/11/25  
Enrolled
9/11/25  
Passed
10/11/25  

Caption

Crimes: threats.

Impact

The introduction of this bill will clarify existing laws regarding threats, expanding the scope to include threats made through various means, including digital platforms. Adults aged 18 and over could face imprisonment as a wobbler offense, allowing for a year in county jail or potentially longer sentences if necessary, while those below 18 years of age would be directed towards services rather than traditional punitive measures. This approach aims to balance accountability with rehabilitation for younger offenders.

Summary

Senate Bill 19 aims to enhance the legal framework surrounding threats made against individuals in sensitive locations, such as daycares, schools, workplaces, houses of worship, and medical facilities. By adding Section 422.3 to the Penal Code, the bill specifies that it is a crime to willfully threaten to commit a crime that could result in death or serious bodily injury, regardless of the intent to actually carry out such a threat. This provision is designed to provide heightened protection to vulnerable populations in environments where safety is critical.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 19 is largely supportive among legislators who prioritize the improvement of public safety measures. Advocates argue that the bill provides necessary legal tools to address the pervasive issue of threats in settings where individuals gather. However, some legislators express concerns regarding the implications for freedom of speech and the potential for overreach in interpreting what constitutes a threat.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the bill's definitions and the classifications of threats, specifically the distinction between a legitimate threat and statements made in jest or under duress. Critics of the bill worry that this broadened definition might lead to inconsistent enforcement and could disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals who may express themselves without malicious intent. Additionally, there are discussions concerning the financial mandates on local governments regarding the enforcement of new duties created by this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB352

Crimes: criminal threats.

CA AB535

Threatening a witness: assisting a prosecution.

CA SB239

Crimes: criminal threats.

CA SB221

Crimes: stalking.

CA SB805

Crimes.

CA HB188

Crimes and offenses; making a terrorist threat in the second degree, elements revised, criminal penalties further provided for

CA HB233

Crimes and offenses; making a terrorist threat in the second degree, elements revised, criminal penalties further provided for

CA HB389

Crimes and procedure; domestic violence crimes, substantially revised; temporary holding periods and bond requirements, established; criminal penalties increased under certain conditions

CA H0445

Dangerous Crimes

CA SB258

Crimes: rape.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.