California Senate Bill SB14

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/2/24
• Refer: 1/29/25
• Refer: 3/24/25
• Refer: 4/2/25
• Refer: 4/3/25
• Report Pass: 4/22/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Report Pass: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/7/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/16/25
• Report Pass: 7/8/25
• Refer: 7/9/25
• Refer: 7/10/25

Caption

An act to add amend Section 12405 to 12203 of the Public Contract Code, and to amend Sections 42920 and 42926 of the Public Resources Code, relating to solid waste.

Impact

If enacted, SB14 would significantly alter existing procurement practices within state agencies by prohibiting the purchase or contract renewal of single-use plastic bottles made of less than 90% recycled plastic. This approach aims to mitigate plastic waste and encourage the adoption of more sustainable practices in state-run food service facilities. Additionally, the bill mandates that state agencies replace single-use plastics with recyclable and reusable alternatives, thereby fostering a shift towards sustainable materials in government operations.

Summary

Senate Bill 14 (SB14), introduced by Senator Blakespear, aims to enhance the state's efforts in solid waste management by imposing stricter regulations on the procurement of single-use plastic bottles by state agencies. The bill is an amendment to the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 and reinforces the requirement for state entities to achieve a minimum of 50% solid waste diversion through various means including recycling, composting, and source reduction. Each state agency will be required to develop an integrated waste management plan that outlines specific actions towards waste reduction, particularly focusing on single-use plastic bottles.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB14 reflects a growing concern for environmental sustainability and a proactive approach towards waste management. Advocates view the bill as a critical step in reducing plastic pollution and enhancing public health and environmental outcomes. However, there may also be apprehensions regarding the financial and logistical implications for state agencies in transitioning to new procurement practices, as well as the potential cost of compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the practicality of enforcing the new procurement rules, especially for essential services during emergencies. Specifically, the bill allows exceptions for purchasing single-use plastics if necessary for public health and safety. This provision raises discussions about the balance between environmental goals and urgent operational needs. Furthermore, while the bill imposes additional responsibilities on state entities, there are concerns about whether sufficient support, guidance, and resources will be provided to ensure successful compliance and implementation.