California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB13

Introduced
 
Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
1/29/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Failed
2/2/26  

Caption

Oil and gas.

Impact

Under SB 13, the State Air Resources Board is required to conduct annual assessments of the greenhouse gas emissions related to the transportation of oil within California and provide this information on its website. This data will help enhance transparency around oil sourcing and its environmental impact, particularly as the state prepares to potentially import a percentage of its gasoline supply using tanker ships. The bill also prohibits the use of electric ratepayer funds for its implementation, aiming to ensure that initiatives related to oil and gas oversight are funded through appropriate channels.

Summary

Senate Bill 13, introduced by Senator Grove, focuses on enhancing California's oil and gas regulation framework. The bill mandates that the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission monitor foreign countries exporting oil to California, identifying those with documented human rights abuses and lower environmental standards compared to California. This proactive measure aims to inform the public and lawmakers about the ethical and environmental implications associated with oil imports, ultimately influencing decision-making in energy policies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 13 appears to be generally supportive among environmental and human rights advocates, who see it as an important step towards accountability in oil sourcing. However, there may be underlying tensions from industry stakeholders who could view increased regulatory measures as restrictive or burdensome. The bill reflects a growing recognition within the California legislature of the importance of considering human rights and environmental impacts in energy policy-making.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the operational feasibility of monitoring foreign countries and the potential economic impacts of increasing scrutiny on oil imports. Critics might argue that such regulations could lead to higher costs for consumers if sourcing becomes more restricted or complicated. The bill sparks a vital conversation about balancing state energy needs with ethical considerations and environmental responsibilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB237

Oil spill prevention: gasoline specifications: suspension: California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions: County of Kern: transportation fuels assessment: coastal resources.

CA SB613

Methane emissions: petroleum and natural gas producing low methane emissions.

CA HB205

Oil And Gas: Waste, Discharge, Pollution

CA SB567

Gravity-Based Energy Storage Well Pilot Program.

CA AB2608

Energy: transportation fuels assessment.

CA SB1259

Refineries: decommissioning and remediation: cost estimates.

CA AB2672

Transportation fuels: gasoline specifications: air pollution.

CA AB2716

Oil and gas: bonding requirements.

CA SB1733

Oil and gas commission; helium

CA AB2461

Oil and gas: bonding requirements.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.