California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1130

Introduced
2/17/26  
Refer
2/26/26  
Report Pass
3/26/26  
Refer
4/6/26  
Report Pass
3/26/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Refer
4/6/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  

Caption

Invasion of privacy: wearable recording devices.

Impact

If enacted, SB1130 would bring significant changes to existing privacy laws, namely by formally incorporating the regulation of wearable recording devices into the Business and Professions Code and the Penal Code. Violations of these provisions could result in fines up to $1,500 or misdemeanor imprisonment. Moreover, the bill also prohibits the selling or manufacturing of technology that can disable indicators on these devices that signal when they are recording, thereby promoting transparency in recording activities.

Summary

SB1130, introduced by Senator Reyes, focuses on the regulation of wearable recording devices to enhance privacy protections in California. The bill emphasizes that individuals are prohibited from using such devices to capture audio or video in areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as places of business, without explicit consent. This aims to address growing concerns about privacy violations through unregulated recording capabilities in public and private spaces.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1130 appears to be cautiously supportive among those advocating for individual privacy rights. Privacy advocates argue that the bill appropriately responds to technological advancements that outpace current regulations. However, some concerns have been raised about the implications for security and surveillance within businesses, as certain businesses may view the bill as overly restrictive to their operational requirements.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between individual privacy rights and business interests. Some industry stakeholders argue that the blanket prohibition on recording without consent may hinder legitimate security operations and employee oversight. Moreover, the definition and scope of what constitutes a reasonable expectation of privacy continue to be debated, raising questions about how the law will be practically enforced in various business environments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1571

Product safety: recreational water safety: wearable personal flotation devices: infants and children.

CA AB1839

Privacy: driver’s license information.

CA SB690

An act to amend Sections 631, 632, 632.

CA S0980

Nicotine Dispensing Devices

CA AB2624

Privacy for immigration support services providers.

CA S0506

Public Records/Body Camera Recordings Recorded by a Code Inspector

CA AB379

An act to amend Sections 52.

CA AB366

Ignition interlock devices.

CA AB2049

Private security services and private investigators: BB devices.

CA AB71

Ignition interlock devices.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.