California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB883

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Report Pass
1/7/26  
Refer
1/8/26  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Refer
1/22/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  
Engrossed
1/26/26  

Caption

Elected officials and judges.

Impact

The bill will amend existing sections of California's Civil Code to establish new guidelines for data brokers regarding the protection of personal information. By setting standards for the removal and confidentiality of sensitive data, AB 883 seeks to mitigate the risk posed by data brokers who traffic in personal information without the consent or knowledge of these officials. If enacted, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) will need to create an accessible mechanism for elected officials and judges to submit deletion requests, significantly altering how personal data is managed and protected within the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 883, introduced by Assembly Member Lowenthal, aims to enhance the privacy protections for elected officials and judges by regulating data brokers. The bill mandates that data brokers, who collect and sell personal information, must delete sensitive information related to state and local elected officials, judges, and their immediate family members if a verified threat identification letter is provided along with a request for deletion. This represents a targeted effort to protect individuals in public office from potential threats that may arise from public access to their private information.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 883 appears to be supportive, especially among advocates for privacy rights and safety of public officials. Proponents see the bill as a necessary step to prevent the misuse of personal data that could lead to harassment or violence against those in public positions. However, concerns may be raised regarding the implications of limiting public access to certain personal information about public officials, which could lead to debates about transparency and accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 883 include the balance between public transparency and personal privacy. While the bill aims to protect individuals who may be at risk, critics may argue that restricting access to information could undermine the public's right to know about the officials who serve them. Furthermore, there may be challenges regarding the mechanisms for verifying threats and the logistics of compliance for data brokers, raising questions about the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1712

Retirement; judges; elected officials

CA AB1392

Elections: voter registration information: elected officials and candidates.

CA HB1621

To Amend The Freedom Of Information Act Of 1967; And To Exempt Personal Information Of Elected Constitutional Officers, Judicial Officials, Elected County Officials, Elected Municipal Officials, And Their Immediate Family.

CA HB1229

Salaries of Elected Local Officials

CA SB1418

Elections officials: meetings.

CA AB343

California Public Records Act: elected or appointed officials.

CA AB2573

Voter registration information: elected officials and candidates.

CA HB2502

ASRS; retirement; elected officials

CA SB1646

Absence; state elected officials

CA HB370

Youth Sports Officials

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.