California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB869

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  

Caption

An act to add Section 11549.

Impact

The adoption of Zero Trust architecture is intended to mitigate the risks associated with cyber threats that have increasingly severe consequences for state operations. By implementing strict access controls and requiring multifactor authentication, enterprises can better protect sensitive information from unauthorized access and data breaches. This legislative push reflects a growing recognition of the need for adaptive security strategies in the face of evolving cyber risks. The bill also aims to standardize security practices across different state agencies, potentially leading to greater efficiency in handling cybersecurity incidents and reduced vulnerabilities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 869, introduced by Assembly Member Irwin, proposes the implementation of Zero Trust architecture across all state agencies within California. The bill mandates that state agencies ensure that data, hardware, software, and internal systems adhere to specific security measures as defined by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Maturity Model. This includes achieving both Advanced maturity by June 1, 2026, and Optimal maturity by June 1, 2030. The Zero Trust model emphasizes that all users, whether inside or outside the organization’s network, must be authenticated and continuously validated before accessing any applications and data, reinforcing the state's commitment to robust cybersecurity frameworks.

Contention

While proponents advocate for enhanced security measures that aim to build public trust and confidence, there may be challenges regarding the implementation of such extensive security protocols. Concerns could arise over the allocation of resources necessary to upgrade existing systems, training personnel on new standards, and ensuring compliance across diverse state departments. Additionally, discussions may emerge about the implications of such a centralized model, especially regarding flexibility and local governance, as individual agencies might have unique needs that could clash with a one-size-fits-all approach.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB716

An act to add and repeal Section Sections 873.

CA AB129

An act to amend Section 19878 of, and to add Sections 19816.

CA AB130

An act to amend Sections 714.

CA SB334

An act to amend Section 51934 of, to add Sections 221.

CA SB130

An act to amend Sections 714.

CA AB137

An act to amend Sections 1798.

CA SB540

An act to amend Sections 337 and 399.

CA SB256

An act to amend Sections 8386 and 8387 of, to add Sections 762.

CA AB1052

An act to amend Sections 1501 and 1520 of, and to add Sections 1516.

CA SB337

An act to amend Sections 289.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.