California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB762

Introduced
2/18/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/15/26  
Refer
1/22/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  
Engrossed
1/29/26  

Caption

Disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation device: prohibition.

Impact

The bill will significantly alter existing laws surrounding the sale and distribution of vapor devices, by classifying violations as infractions with civil penalties. Local governments and the state will be authorized to impose fines for violations, reinforcing enforcement against manufacturers and sellers who do not comply. The specified penalties range from $500 for the first infraction to $2,000 for subsequent offenses. Furthermore, the bill aligns with existing state laws regarding single-use plastic products, reflecting a broader trend toward reducing single-use items.

Summary

Assembly Bill 762 aims to prohibit the manufacture, importation, and sale of new or refurbished disposable, battery-embedded vapor inhalation devices in California. The bill's key provisions dictate that starting January 1, 2027, it will be illegal to import or manufacture such devices, while the sale or distribution will be banned starting January 1, 2028. This legislative action addresses concerns over public health and environmental impact, responding to rising usage among youth and the challenges posed by battery waste from these devices.

Sentiment

Supporters of AB 762 view it as an essential step to safeguard public health, especially among the youth, who are increasingly drawn to vaping products. They argue that the environmental implications of battery waste necessitate stricter regulations on disposable devices. However, some critics raise concerns about the potential economic impact on businesses reliant on vapor sales and suggest that a complete prohibition may push consumers to unregulated markets, which could lead to safety issues without adequate oversight.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between public health and business interests. Proponents emphasize the necessity to mitigate health risks associated with vaping, particularly regarding youth access, while opponents advocate for the rights of businesses to provide consumer choices. Additionally, there are discussions surrounding the effectiveness of a blanket ban versus potential measures that encourage responsible usage and disposal of vaping devices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB501

Responsible Battery Recycling Act of 2022: covered batteries.

CA SB526

To Prohibit The Sale Of Disposable Vapor Products From A Prohibited Foreign Party.

CA H1067

Battery Collection and Disposal

CA SB163

Battery Stewardship Programs

CA SB003

End-of-Life Management of Electric Vehicle Batteries

CA S0912

Battery Collection and Recovery

CA SB252

To Inform The Public Of Health Risks Caused By Vapor Products And E-liquid Products; And To Ensure The Safety Of Arkansas Youth.

CA HB552

Covington County, county excise tax levied on vapor products, vaping devices, alternative nicotine products, and psychoactive cannabinoids

CA HB05019

An Act Establishing Extended Producer Responsibility For Consumer Batteries.

CA HB4116

TPT; use tax; exemption; batteries

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.