California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB711

Introduced
2/14/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Engrossed
5/15/25  
Refer
5/15/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  
Enrolled
7/3/25  
Chaptered
7/28/25  

Caption

An act to amend Section 2016.

Impact

The legislation aims to streamline court procedures by ensuring that the process of hiring shorthand reporters becomes more transparent and standardized. By mandating notification about discussions related to retaining shorthand reporters, the bill enhances the organization of civil proceedings. The introduction of electronic communication as an acceptable method for discussions aims to make compliance easier and more efficient, particularly in an era where digital communication is prevalent. This reflects a broader trend towards modernization in legal practices to keep pace with technological advancements.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 711, also known as AB711, amends Section 2016.040 of the Code of Civil Procedure concerning civil actions. The bill introduces a requirement that the meet and confer notices, which are necessary for supporting various motions, must specify that the parties have discussed the retention of a certified shorthand reporter for the hearing on the motion. The amendment also allows for these discussions to take place through electronic communications, thus modernizing the approach to procedural requirements in legal settings.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB711 appears to be positive, as it seeks to enhance efficiency in the legal system. Supporters of the bill appreciate its alignment with technological progress and believe that clearer requirements can lead to better management of court resources. However, there may be concerns from some legal practitioners about the additional requirements and whether they could slow down the process rather than expedite it. As the legal community adapts, feedback from practitioners will be vital to gauge the long-term impacts of this change.

Contention

While the bill is generally viewed as a supportive measure for better organization in civil law, some critics might argue about the practicality of enforcing these procedures, especially in less technologically inclined settings. There may also be discussions regarding the implications for smaller legal practices that might not have ready access to shorthand reporters or efficient electronic communication platforms. Stakeholder feedback after implementation will be essential to address any potential challenges the provisions might bring.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1234

An act to amend Sections 98, 98.

CA AB649

An act to amend Section Sections 55 and 1938 of, to amend, repeal, and add Sections 55.

CA SB577

An act to amend Sections 128.

CA AB1170

An act to amend Sections 205, 208, 1944, 2529.

CA AB137

An act to amend Sections 1798.

CA AB882

An act to add and repeal Section 69957.

CA AB540

An act to amend Sections 437c, 1005, and 1010.

CA SB331

An act to amend Sections 5008, 5977, 5977.

CA AB824

An act to amend Sections 527.

CA SB808

An act to add Sections 46 and 1094.

Similar Bills

CA AB1189

Court reporting: digital reporters and legal transcriptionists.

CA AB882

An act to add and repeal Section 69957.

CA AB2290

Civil discovery: oral depositions: transcriptions.

CA AB1521

Committee on Judiciary: judiciary omnibus.

CA AB1917

Criminal procedure: information.

DE SB93

An Act To Amend Title 12, Title 16, Title 21, And Title 31 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Third-party Decision Making.

AZ HB2748

Oil and gas commission; fees

CA AB2783

Court reporting.