California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB653

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/4/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Refer
7/14/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/13/25  
Enrolled
9/13/25  
Chaptered
10/6/25  
Passed
10/6/25  

Caption

Child abuse: mandated reporters: talent agents, managers, and coaches.

Impact

The implementation of AB 653 will formally insert talent agents, talent managers, and talent coaches into the framework of mandated reporters under California law. This legal status treats failure to report observed or suspected child abuse as a misdemeanor, punishable by fines or imprisonment. As these professionals often work closely with minors, the bill is poised to enhance legal protections for children in the entertainment field, contributing to a broader cultural shift towards accountability and safety. Importantly, the bill specifically states that no reimbursement is required from local agencies or school districts for any costs incurred due to this act, which may reflect an effort to mitigate opposition based on fiscal concerns.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 653, known as The Child Abuse Mandated Entertainment Reporter Act (CAMERA), seeks to amend Section 11165.7 of the California Penal Code to include talent agents, managers, and coaches as mandated reporters of child abuse and neglect. This addition aims to ensure that individuals who have a professional responsibility for children in the entertainment industry are legally obliged to report any suspected instances of abuse or neglect, similar to existing requirements for educators and healthcare professionals. The intent behind the bill is to expand the circle of vigilance surrounding child welfare in contexts where minors are often vulnerable.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 653 appears largely positive among child protection advocates and those within the entertainment community who recognize the importance of safeguarding children. Supporters argue that expanding the scope of mandatory reporting is a significant step toward creating safer environments for minors involved in entertainment. However, some industry stakeholders may express concerns about the potential implications for their roles and responsibilities, fearing that expanded liability could complicate their professional relationships and duties.

Contention

Debate on AB 653 is expected to highlight nuances regarding the responsibilities imposed on a broader array of professionals, including talent agents and coaches. Critics may argue that additional reporting obligations could create barriers, deter potential industry professionals from working with children, or complicate existing support structures. Notably, the bill also references complementary legislation (Senate Bills 402 and 848), which introduces conditions for its enactment, suggesting legislative collaborations and potential alignment issues that could prompt further discussion within California's legislative framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1566

Crimes: mandated reporters: severe neglect.

CA AB970

Child abuse and neglect reporting.

CA SB848

Pupil safety: school employee misconduct: child abuse prevention.

CA AB871

Mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult.

CA SB00258

An Act Requiring Providers Of Reproductive Health Care And Counseling To Be Mandatory Reporters Of Child Abuse And Neglect.

CA HB1188

Mandatory Reporter Task Force Recommendations

CA AB1688

Child abuse or neglect: reporting.

CA AB1192

Child abuse or neglect: reporting.

CA SB1018

False allegations; child abuse; parents

CA S0362

Reports of Child Abuse, Abandonment, or Neglect

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.