California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB57

Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
2/24/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Report Pass
3/3/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
5/29/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
6/18/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Report Pass
6/24/25  
Refer
6/24/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  

Caption

California Dream for All Program: descendants of formerly enslaved people.

Impact

The implementation of AB 57 is expected to foster significant changes within California's housing finance structure. By ensuring that a portion of funds is allocated specifically for descendants of enslaved people, the bill aims to address historical inequities in access to homeownership. This strategic allocation of resources is anticipated to create opportunities for financial security and wealth accumulation among the targeted demographic, thereby improving their socio-economic standing.

Summary

AB 57, introduced by Assembly Member McKinnor, aims to amend the Health and Safety Code to enhance the California Dream for All Program, specifically targeting descendants of formerly enslaved people. The bill mandates that upon the establishment of a certification process by the Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery, at least 10% of the funds in the California Dream for All Fund must be reserved for applicants certified as descendants of enslaved Americans. This proposal is a step towards facilitating pathways for housing equity among historically marginalized groups.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment related to AB 57 appears to be supportive among its sponsors and advocates, who view it as a critical measure for rectifying historical injustices. Proponents believe that the bill will positively impact community wealth-building initiatives and contribute to a more inclusive housing policy. However, discussions around the bill may also encounter resistance from those who oppose reparations or specific allocations of public funds, which could result in a polarized debate.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 57 may arise from differing views on the efficacy and fairness of earmarking funds specifically for descendants of enslaved individuals. Critics might argue that such measures could complicate the broader objectives of affordable housing programs, while supporters could counter that targeted assistance is necessary to rectify systemic inequities. Additionally, the bill’s enactment is contingent upon the successful passage and implementation of SB 518, which establishes a Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery, adding another layer of legislative complexity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB518

Descendants of enslaved persons: reparations.

CA SB437

California State University: claim eligibility: genealogy and descendancy.

CA AB2387

California Dream for All Program: first-generation homebuyers.

CA AB681

California DREAM Loan Program: limits.

CA AB7

Postsecondary education: admissions preference: descendants of slavery.

CA AB742

Department of Consumer Affairs: licensing: applicants who are descendants of slaves.

CA AB619

California Conservation Corps: training programs: formerly incarcerated individuals: reporting.

CA SB1362

DREAM grant program.

CA AB1315

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.

CA AB2599

Slavery: corporate disclosures.

Similar Bills

CA SB345

An act to amend Sections 13157 and 13159.

CA SB1363

Barbering and cosmetology.

CO HB1295

Food Truck Operations

AZ SB1641

Marijuana producers; licensure

CA AB1245

State contracts: certification process: forced labor and human trafficking.

AZ SB1713

Marijuana; dual licensees; rural communities

CA AB313

An act to amend Section 69513.

AZ SB1057

Marijuana; rural opportunity initiative