California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB506

Introduced
2/10/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
6/17/25  
Refer
6/17/25  
Report Pass
6/19/25  
Refer
6/19/25  
Report Pass
6/23/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/10/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Chaptered
10/9/25  

Caption

Pets: sales of dogs, cats, and rabbits.

Impact

The implementation of AB 506 will amend existing laws related to pet sales, specifically targeting contracts that may be considered void due to their inclusion of nonrefundable deposits. It requires pet dealers and businesses selling dogs, cats, and rabbits in California to provide detailed information about the original sources of the animals, including breeder details and any medical records. Violating these provisions may result in civil action against the sellers, enabling consumers to recover any money exchanged under void contracts and seek additional remedies through the court system.

Summary

Assembly Bill 506, known as the Pets: Sales of Dogs, Cats, and Rabbits bill, aims to enhance consumer protection in the sale of pets in California. Scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2026, the bill prohibits contracts for the transfer of ownership of dogs, cats, and rabbits that include or require a nonrefundable deposit. This measure is intended to protect consumers from potentially exploitative practices by pet dealers and increase transparency regarding the animals being sold.

Sentiment

Responses to AB 506 have generally been positive among advocates of animal rights and consumer protection groups, who see it as a necessary regulatory step to curb unethical pet sales practices. However, some pet dealers have expressed concerns that the restrictions could impede their business operations or complicate transactions. The overall debate reflects larger discussions regarding consumer rights versus business interests in the pet industry.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the bill's impact on businesses that operate under current laws that may change significantly. Pet dealers worry that the restrictions on nonrefundable deposits could lead to financial challenges, particularly for small businesses. Conversely, proponents argue that such measures are essential for consumer protection and accountability in the pet-selling industry, highlighting the need for responsible pet ownership and ethical sourcing practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA HB05112

An Act Prohibiting Pet Stores From Purchasing Or Procuring Dogs, Cats And Rabbits.

CA HB05138

An Act Prohibiting The Sale Of Cats, Dogs And Rabbits In Pet Shops.

CA AB519

Pet broker sales.

CA HB06255

An Act Prohibiting The Sale Of Dogs, Cats And Rabbits In Pet Stores.

CA AB1482

Bowie’s Law: animals: adoption, shelter overcrowding, and breeding.

CA HB06832

An Act Authorizing Municipalities To Prohibit The Sale Of Dogs, Cats And Rabbits In Pet Shops.

CA HB05283

An Act Authorizing Municipalities To Prohibit The Sale Of Dogs, Cats And Rabbits In Pet Shops.

CA SB1539

Animal breeders; dogs; cats; taxes

CA HB06242

An Act Requiring Pet Stores, Shelters And Animal Breeders To Perform Mandatory Vaccinations For Cats And Dogs.

CA HB1011

Transfers of Certain Pet Animals

Similar Bills

CA AB1931

Insurance: home protection companies.

CA AB2187

Public contracts: contracts for services.

CA AB1809

Public contracts: school and community college districts.

CA SB272

San Mateo County Transit District: job order contracting: pilot program.

CA AB2033

Local Agency Public Construction Act: job order contracting: cities.

CA AB483

Fixed term installment contracts: early termination fees.

AZ HB2895

Task order contracts; website; posting

AZ HB2445

Task order contracts; website; posting