California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2770

Introduced
2/20/26  
Refer
3/23/26  
Report Pass
4/6/26  
Refer
4/7/26  
Report Pass
4/15/26  
Refer
4/20/26  
Report Pass
4/23/26  
Refer
4/23/26  
Refer
5/6/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/26/26  

Caption

State Property: San Pasqual Battlefield State Park.

Impact

The bill will exempt the transferred land from property taxation and impose a state-mandated local program involving the administration of this exemption. Additionally, it encourages the City of San Diego to transfer its interests in the land to the tribe. By removing the state’s interests in the land, the tribe is empowered to manage the land for cultural and educational purposes, enhancing its agency over ancestral territories. Such changes signify substantial alterations to state property management related to tribal lands and rights.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2770, introduced by Assembly Member Alvarez, pertains to the San Pasqual Battlefield State Park and aims to address historical injustices faced by the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians. The bill mandates the quitclaim of state land within the park back to the tribe, specifically three parcels totaling approximately 3.68 acres, at no cost. This initiative seeks to rectify the wrongful removal of the tribe from its ancestral lands and to facilitate the establishment of a public park dedicated to educating the public about the tribe's history and contributions to the community.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2770 is largely supportive among those advocating for Native American rights and recognizing historical injustices. Proponents view it as a critical step towards reconciliation and empowerment for the San Pasqual Band of Mission Indians. However, there may be lingering concerns from some stakeholders regarding potential impacts on local governance and property tax revenues due to the tax exemption status for the transferred land.

Contention

Key points of contention may arise from the implications of exempting the land from property taxation, which may affect local agencies and their funding. Additionally, the bill’s restrictions on commercial use of the land could spark debates on economic development opportunities that might be limited. Critics might argue that while the bill serves an important public purpose, it may inadvertently disadvantage local resources or governance capabilities in the long term.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB971

State Property: San Pasqual Battlefield State Park.

CA AB2539

Tribal-state gaming compacts: ratification.

CA SB630

State parks: real property: acquisitions and leases.

CA AB2356

State parks: Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation: Tolowa Dunes State Park.

CA ACR155

Native Sons of the Golden West and Native Daughters of the Golden West.

CA AB385

Regional park property: County of San Bernardino: Glen Helen Regional Park.

CA AB831

Gambling: operation of a contest or sweepstakes.

CA SB1746

Management; state properties; 2025-2026

CA SB461

State real property: City of Imperial.

CA AB98

State property: City of Moreno Valley.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.