California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2697

Introduced
2/20/26  
Refer
3/16/26  
Report Pass
3/16/26  
Refer
3/17/26  
Report Pass
4/13/26  
Refer
4/14/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/21/26  
Report Pass
5/6/26  
Engrossed
5/11/26  
Refer
5/12/26  

Caption

Cannabis: drive-throughs.

Impact

The bill represents a significant shift in how cannabis retail can be conducted in California, allowing for increased flexibility and potentially expanding business opportunities for licensed retailers. By permitting drive-through sales, AB 2697 aligns cannabis retailing with the practices established in other retail sectors, which could promote economic growth and consumer satisfaction. Nevertheless, the bill maintains that local jurisdictions retain the authority to regulate these operations, thus providing them with flexibility to tailor regulations according to community needs.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2697, introduced by Assembly Member Pellerin, aims to amend the Business and Professions Code by adding Section 26204, which allows local jurisdictions in California to authorize licensed cannabis retailers to conduct sales or deliveries through drive-throughs, pass-out windows, or slide-out trays. This legislation modifies existing regulations that currently prohibit such transactions, primarily intended to enhance accessibility and convenience for cannabis consumers while ensuring compliance with security protocols. The bill stipulates that these sales must be executed through a fixed-pane security window that includes a secure transfer mechanism.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2697 seems largely positive amongst cannabis advocates and businesses who view it as a progressive step towards normalization of cannabis commerce. They celebrate the move as an enhancement of consumer convenience and an adaptation to modern retail practices. However, there may also be concerns from local governments and regulatory bodies regarding the potential implications for public health and safety, particularly in ensuring that minors do not access cannabis and that sales are conducted responsibly.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise concerning local control versus state regulation. While proponents advocate for streamlined sales processes that could improve business outcomes, opponents might stress the importance of robust local oversight to address public health and safety concerns that could emerge from increased accessibility of cannabis products. The excluded provisions for businesses that solely operate delivery services also introduce discussions regarding equity in the market and the treatment of various cannabis business models in California.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB8

Cannabis: cannabinoids: industrial hemp.

CA AB2250

Cannabis: cannabinoids.

CA AB2249

Cannabis: labels, packaging, and manufacturing.

CA AB1332

Medicinal cannabis: shipments.

CA AB1965

Cannabis: testing: quality assurance.

CA AB2532

Cannabis: labels, packaging, and manufacturing.

CA SB141

California Cannabis Tax Fund: Department of Cannabis Control: Board of State and Community Corrections grants.

CA B26-0051

Comprehensive Cannabis Legalization and Regulation Amendment Act of 2025

CA AB2420

Cannabis: donations: seniors.

CA HB05350

An Act Concerning Cannabis, Hemp And Infused Beverage Regulation.

Similar Bills

CA AB578

Food delivery platforms: customer service.

AR SB98

To Amend The Law Regarding Alcoholic Beverages; To Authorize The Third-party Delivery Of Alcoholic Beverages From Certain Retailers; And To Create A Third-party Delivery Permit.

AZ SB1184

Transportation services employees; drivers; wages

CO HB1144

Repeal Retail Delivery Fees

CO HB1266

Repeal Retail Delivery Fees

DE SB168

An Act To Amend Title 4 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Alcoholic Liquors.

CT SB01487

An Act Concerning Transportation Network Companies And Third-party Delivery Companies.

CA SB568

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems: schoolsites and childcare programs.