California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2655

Introduced
2/20/26  
Refer
3/16/26  
Report Pass
4/15/26  
Refer
4/16/26  
Report Pass
4/29/26  
Engrossed
5/7/26  
Refer
5/7/26  

Caption

Campaign funds: security expenses: security personnel.

Impact

This bill aligns with the broader goals of the Political Reform Act, which seeks to ensure ethical standards in campaign financing. By establishing limitations on the expenditure of campaign funds for security, AB2655 aims to enhance accountability and reduce potential misuse of campaign funds. The bill highlights a shift towards ensuring that public funds are used responsibly while protecting candidates and their families from potential threats as derived from their public service roles.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2655, introduced by Assembly Member Valencia, aims to amend the Government Code regarding the use of campaign funds specifically for security expenses related to candidates and elected officials. The existing framework allows candidates and elected officers to use campaign funds without monetary caps for security purposes, including personal security and installation of electronic security systems. However, AB2655 introduces a significant limitation by enforcing that funds can be expended for security personnel only if they hold the appropriate licenses issued by the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services, effective until January 1, 2029. After that date, a monetary cap of $10,000 per calendar year will apply to such expenditures.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention surround the balance between providing proper security for elected officials and potential overreach in regulating how campaign funds are spent. Supporters argue that limiting the use of campaign funds for unlicensed security personnel ensures accountability, while critics may see it as an unnecessary restriction that could endanger candidates' safety. The bill's requirement for detailed reporting of expenditures, including verification of threats necessitating such expenses, is likely to generate debate regarding transparency versus the practical implications for candidate safety.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB789

Political Reform Act of 1974: security expenses.

CA HB336

Campaign Contribution Uses: Security

CA S0414

Use of Campaign Funds for Campaign-related Child Care Expenses

CA H0361

Use of Campaign Funds for Campaign-related Child Care Expenses

CA SB230

Campaign contributions; using contributions on certain security expenses to protect candidate, elected official, family members, and staff authorized

CA HB05546

An Act Concerning Campaign Finance Laws, Statutorily Recognized Indigenous Tribes And Security For Candidates, Their Families And Their Campaign Staffs.

CA HB2048

Sales of securities; definition

CA HB62

Campaign finance; campaign contributions used for dependent care expenses authorized

CA HB2466

Campaign finance; caregiver expenses

CA HB2503

Campaign finance; caregiver expenses

Similar Bills

FL S0414

Use of Campaign Funds for Campaign-related Child Care Expenses

CA AB2255

Political Reform Act of 1974: candidate controlled committees: campaign statements.

AR SB351

To Amend The Law Concerning Ethics And Campaign Finance; To Amend Portions Of Initiated Act 1 Of 1990; And To Amend Portions Of Initiated Act 1 Of 1996.

CA AB1789

Political Reform Act of 1974: candidate trainings.

FL H0361

Use of Campaign Funds for Campaign-related Child Care Expenses

CA AB359

An act to amend Section 83123.

CT HB07222

An Act Concerning Various Campaign Finance Reforms.

CT HB07089

An Act Concerning Various Campaign Finance Reforms Recommended By The State Elections Enforcement Commission.