California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2412

Introduced
2/20/26  
Refer
3/9/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Refer
4/13/26  
Report Pass
4/22/26  
Engrossed
5/4/26  

Caption

State agencies or departments: public communications.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2412 would specifically affect how state agencies interact with the public, solidifying the requirement for disclosures regarding AI-generated communications. This represents a significant shift toward accountability and transparency in government interactions, potentially influencing public trust and engagement with state services. The bill is a proactive approach to address concerns regarding misinformation and miscommunication in the digital age, establishing clear guidelines for AI usage across governmental departments.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2412, introduced by Assembly Member Ta and co-authored by Assembly Member Dixon, seeks to amend Section 11549.66 of the Government Code to enhance transparency in communications from state agencies that utilize generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). The bill mandates that any communications, whether personalized or broad announcements, include a prominent disclaimer stating that the message was generated by GenAI. This legislation aims to inform recipients about the nature of their interactions with state services and ensure that human contact information is accessible for further inquiries.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2412 appears largely supportive among lawmakers who recognize the necessity of clear communication amidst growing reliance on AI technologies. Proponents argue that this bill will bolster public trust in government processes. However, some discussions highlight concerns regarding the potential operational burdens on state agencies, questioning whether these new requirements could complicate communication processes without significantly enhancing user experience.

Contention

A notable point of contention regarding AB 2412 revolves around the balance between innovative technology integration and the practical implications of its regulation. Critics may express apprehensions about the enforceability of the proposed guidelines, fearing added layers of complexity for agencies that strive to serve their constituents efficiently. Additionally, the bill's performance in addressing real-world interactions with government services will be closely scrutinized, particularly in how effectively it informs the public while avoiding unnecessary bureaucratic red tape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB85

Publication & Use Of Communications

CA HB86

Publication & Use Of Communications

CA AB2370

Public Safety Communications Division.

CA AB766

State agencies and departments: strategic plans: diversity, equity, and inclusion.

CA AB2424

Public Utilities Commission: communications: low-income customers.

CA SB1315

Public schools; interoperable communications; requirements

CA SB37

Strategic Plans For State Agencies

CA HR1010

To Rename The Gulf Of Mexico The "gulf Of America" And To Require All State Agencies To Use The Term "gulf Of America" In Official Communications.

CA AB1801

Public agencies: approval: detention facilities.

CA SB498

Incarcerated persons: communications.

Similar Bills

CA SB44

Brain-computer interfaces: neural data.

CT HB06846

An Act Concerning The Use Of Artificial Intelligence And Other Means To Generate Deceptive Synthetic Media And Affect Elections.

CA SB702

Legislative and gubernatorial appointments: report.

CT HB05342

An Act Concerning The Use Of Artificial Intelligence And Other Means To Generate Deceptive Synthetic Media And Affect Elections.

CT HB07246

An Act Concerning Modifications To Campaign Finance Laws And State Elections Enforcement Commission Authority.

CT SB01405

An Act Modifying Campaign Finance Laws And The Powers Of The State Elections Enforcement Commission.

CT SB01517

An Act Concerning Referenda, Independent Expenditures And Other Campaign Finance Changes.