California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2390

Introduced
2/20/26  
Refer
3/16/26  
Report Pass
3/16/26  
Refer
3/17/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/23/26  
Report Pass
5/6/26  
Engrossed
5/21/26  

Caption

Streamlined housing approvals: objective standards: review and modifications.

Impact

The impacts of AB 2390 are multifaceted, potentially easing the housing crisis in California by encouraging the construction of multifamily units through less bureaucratic impediment. The bill is slated to be in effect until January 1, 2036, indicating a commitment to addressing a critical statewide issue of affordable housing. Additionally, it includes provisions that eliminate reimbursement requirements for local agencies regarding costs associated with state mandates imposed by this bill. This change could prompt municipalities to more readily accept and implement the streamlined housing process for greater efficiency in local governance.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2390, introduced by Assembly Member Schiavo, aims to amend Section 65913.4 of the California Government Code, focusing on streamlining the approval process for multifamily housing developments. This bill provides a framework for a ministerial approval process that bypasses the need for conditional use permits, conditioned on adherence to specified objective planning standards. One significant aspect of this legislation is its intent to clarify local government review criteria, confining evaluations to areas physically disturbed by construction rather than broader contiguous regions. This stipulation aims to facilitate housing development in less risky areas while ensuring applicable safety standards are met.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2390 appears to be mixed, with support for its potential to alleviate housing shortages countered by concerns regarding local control over land use decisions. Advocates argue that the increased housing supply stems from reduced regulatory burdens, while critics caution against the state-level mandates possibly undermining local governance and community representation regarding housing needs. Overall, the discussion highlights a tension between the urgency of housing development and the preservation of local authority in land use planning.

Contention

Notable points of contention within AB 2390 involve its implications for local governments and property developers. The bill stipulates that local governments cannot delay or obstruct the approval of developments meeting the requisite objective standards, potentially leading to disputes over land use regulations and community standards. Critics have voiced concern that the streamlining may result in developments that do not necessarily reflect local desires or needs, emphasizing the need for balance between state-imposed efficiency and local stakeholder input. Additionally, with the bill classifying housing development as a matter of statewide concern, the boundaries of local authority may face significant reevaluation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB893

Housing development projects: objective standards: campus development zone.

CA AB2118

Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022: use by right: objective standards.

CA AB2601

Planning and zoning: housing development: streamlined approval and subdivisions.

CA AB457

Farmworker housing: streamlined, ministerial approval: Counties of Fresno, Madera, and Merced.

CA AB507

Adaptive reuse: streamlining: incentives.

CA AB1997

Land use: housing development approvals: timelines and processes.

CA AB1294

Planning and zoning: housing development: standardized application form.

CA AB1710

Housing developments: ordinances, policies, and standards.

CA HB05045

An Act Streamlining Health Care Facility Approvals.

CA B26-0543

Housing Permit Streamlining Amendment Act of 2025

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.