California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1927

Introduced
2/13/26  
Refer
3/9/26  
Report Pass
3/16/26  
Refer
3/17/26  
Report Pass
3/25/26  
Refer
3/25/26  
Report Pass
4/6/26  
Refer
4/7/26  
Refer
4/9/26  
Refer
4/29/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/26/26  

Caption

Bail Consumer Protection Act.

Impact

The enactment of AB 1927 will amend existing laws related to the solicitation practices of bail agents, incorporating civil penalties for violations. Under the provisions of this bill, unauthorized solicitation will be punishable by substantial fines, with penalties ranging from $1,000 to $10,000 depending on the number of offenses. Additionally, the California Department of Insurance will gain authority to suspend or revoke the licenses of offending bail agents, emphasizing accountability within the industry.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1927, known as the Bail Consumer Protection Act, aims to redefine and strengthen the regulations surrounding the solicitation of bail services in California. The bill specifically prohibits bail agents or impersonators from engaging in unauthorized solicitation of bail services to family members or contacts of arrested individuals without a bona fide request for those services. This regulation is intended to reduce predatory practices within the bail industry, where vulnerable families may be approached with solicitations at their most stressful times.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1927 is largely supportive, particularly from consumer protection advocates and family rights organizations. Proponents argue that the bill serves as a necessary measure to protect individuals and families in crisis from potentially exploitative practices by bail agents. Conversely, some industry representatives express concerns about the implications for legitimate solicitation practices, suggesting that the bill might limit their ability to operate effectively in the marketplace.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the definition of 'unauthorized solicitation' and the circumstances under which permissible communication may occur. Critics of the bill have raised concerns regarding the potential for overreach and the unintended consequences that may arise from stringent regulations. Additionally, the balance between consumer protection and the operational needs of bail agents has become a focal point in discussions, with some lobbyists advocating for clearer guidelines that protect both individuals and industry professionals.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB01248

An Act Expanding Consumer Protections.

CA HB1261

Motor Vehicle Consumer Protections

CA SB318

Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protections

CA SB01357

An Act Concerning The Department Of Consumer Protection's Recommendations Regarding Various Statutes Concerning Consumer Protection.

CA SB041

Consumer Protections Medical Care Entities

CA AB1833

Consumer Driving Data Protection Act of 2026.

CA SB00004

An Act Concerning Consumer Privacy And Protection.

CA S1396

Litigation Financing Consumer Protection

CA SB00003

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection And Safety.

CA SB00233

An Act Concerning Consumer Protections Regarding Residential Solar And Energy Storage Systems.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.