California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1772

Introduced
2/9/26  
Refer
3/23/26  
Report Pass
3/23/26  
Refer
3/24/26  
Report Pass
4/23/26  

Caption

Fish and wildlife: invasive mussels.

Impact

The implications of AB 1772 are significant, as it would impose stricter regulations on watercraft and impose new responsibilities on water supply operators to prevent and address infestations of invasive mussels. This encompasses the introduction of mandatory decontamination protocols and the establishment of minimum standards for the inspection of vessels. Furthermore, the bill establishes a framework for collaboration among various state entities, including the Departments of Fish and Wildlife, Parks and Recreation, and Food and Agriculture, to promote comprehensive aquatic species management strategies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1772, introduced by Assembly Member Papan, aims to bolster California's defenses against the spread of invasive mussels, particularly the golden mussel. This bill amends existing laws relating to the possession, transportation, and management of invasive mussels. It outlines new enforcement measures that allow law enforcement officers to detain or impound vessels suspected of harboring these invasive species until they are properly decontaminated. This measure reflects the state's commitment to preserving water quality and preventing ecological damage caused by invasive aquatic species.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB 1772 appears to be largely supportive among environmentalists and legislators concerned with the ecological impacts of invasive species. Advocates argue that the bill is essential to safeguard California's waterways and maintain recreational access for future generations. However, there may also be concerns among the recreational boating community about the potential burden of compliance costs and logistical challenges stemming from the bill's strict regulatory measures.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential economic impact on the recreational boating sector, as some opponents may argue that the financial responsibility for invasives management should not fall disproportionately on local boating communities. Additionally, some stakeholders may express concerns over the extensive powers granted to law enforcement under the bill, such as detaining vessels and enforcing decontamination measures, arguing that these could lead to overreach or unnecessary disruptions for recreational users.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1894

Fish and wildlife: invasive mussels: imported water.

CA AB2032

Fish and wildlife: golden mussels.

CA AB2787

Water, parks, and wildlife: omnibus bill.

CA SB149

An act to amend Sections 2301 and 2302 of, and to add Section 2303 to, the Fish and Game Code, to add and repeal Section 515 of the Food and Agricultural Code, to amend Sections 675, 676, and 676.

CA AB149

Public resources trailer bill.

CA AB1673

County fish and wildlife propagation fund: expenditure.

CA HB05525

An Act Concerning A Rapid Response Program For Certain Aquatic Invasive Species.

CA HB321

Fish & Game Wildlife Refuges

CA HB05523

An Act Concerning A Tribal Wildlife And Fisheries Advisory Council.

CA AB1506

Invasive pests: lists.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.