California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1373

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/16/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  

Caption

Water quality: state certification.

Impact

The enactment of AB 1373 alters how the state handles certifications for hydroelectric facilities, aiming to tighten oversight and enhance public participation. The bill prohibits the delegation of authority to issue these certifications if a public hearing is requested, which is intended to maintain accountability within the certification process. Furthermore, the State Water Board will be allowed to charge fees to applicants that reflect the costs incurred in fulfilling these requirements. Therefore, this bill is poised to enhance the regulatory framework surrounding hydroelectric power in California.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1373, introduced by Assembly Member Soria, addresses the certification process for water quality related to hydroelectric facilities in California. Specifically, it mandates that, upon request from an applicant, the State Water Resources Control Board must hold a public hearing at least 21 days prior to taking any action on an application for a license to operate a hydroelectric facility, provided the applicant requests this within 14 days of receiving an initial draft certification. This approach ensures stakeholder engagement and transparency in the certification process.

Sentiment

Sentiment around AB 1373 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who advocate for increased environmental oversight and public involvement in decisions related to water quality. However, some stakeholders, particularly from the hydroelectric industry, may express concerns about the potential for longer processing times due to the newly mandated public hearings. This could reflect broader debates in the state regarding environmental protection versus the operational needs of energy providers.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 1373 may arise around the impact of public hearings on the efficiency of the certification process. Advocates for more rigorous environmental accountability would argue that such hearings are necessary to protect water resources, while opponents might claim it could overburden the system and delay important energy projects. The balance between environmental stewardship and the development of renewable energy projects will likely be a central theme in discussions surrounding this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1313

Water quality: permits.

CA AB854

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions.

CA AB1000

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: Five-Mile Basin.

CA SB31

Water quality: recycled water.

CA AB497

San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Water Quality Control Plan: update: substitute environmental document: exemption.

CA SB1375

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: urban intermodal rail station project.

CA AB2322

Water discharge: commercial, industrial, or institutional sites.

CA SB1445

Water quality; testing; on-site

CA HB1145

Mobile Home Park Water Quality

CA AB2447

Water: Nitrogen Pollution Reduction Act.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.