California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1359

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Refer
1/22/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  
Engrossed
1/26/26  

Caption

Jury service exemptions.

Impact

The bill significantly affects state laws regarding housing development and jury service exemptions. By allowing housing-forward jurisdictions to impose conditions that prevent the reduction of required bicycle parking or commercial floor space when applying for density bonuses, the legislation aims to enhance housing quality and urban planning standards. The change in jury service laws will ease the burden on older individuals, enabling those aged 80 and above to permanently excuse themselves from jury duty without needing a medical note, thereby reflecting a social consideration for senior citizens.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1359, introduced by Assembly Member Ahrens, addresses two primary areas: the planning and zoning regulations for housing-forward jurisdictions and exemptions for jury service for individuals aged 80 and older. It aims to update the provisions governing the conditions that local governments can impose on housing development projects, particularly in jurisdictions designated as prohousing by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This bill allows such jurisdictions to impose certain conditions on developers, which include maintaining specific standards for bicycle parking and reducing the use of density bonuses that could otherwise lead to less accountability in housing standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 1359 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who believe that enhancing conditions for housing development aligns with the state's need for more housing units. However, there is also concern among developers and local governments about potential increases in costs and complexities related to compliance with the new conditions imposed by the bill. The jury service exemption is generally viewed positively, as it alleviates burdens on older citizens who may have difficulty participating in jury service due to age-related challenges.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the balance of developer incentives versus community planning requirements. Some stakeholders express concern that limiting density bonuses could disincentivize developers from engaging in affordable housing projects, potentially leading to fewer housing units being built. Additionally, while the jury service exemption simplifies the process for older individuals, questions arise about the fairness of exempting a specific age group without similar provisions for other groups experiencing hardships.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA HB209

Jury duty; exemption for nursing mothers

CA SB76

Jury duty; exemption for nursing mothers

CA HB1065

Jury Duty Opt-Out for Certain People

CA SB106

Jury service; individuals 80 years of age or older exempt from service upon request

CA HB1022

Jury Duty Opt-Out for People 72 Years or Older

CA SB1063

Juror summons; election worker option

CA SB1655

Juror summons; election worker option

CA AB2405

Emergency Medical Services Act.

CA SB1658

Legal decision-making; jury trial

CA HB1235

Jury Trials for Tenant Proceedings

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.