California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1328

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  
Report Pass
7/17/25  
Refer
7/17/25  

Caption

An act to add Sections 14124.

Impact

AB 1328 aims to enhance the financial support for nonemergency ambulance services, benefitting both providers and the patients they serve. By establishing a standardized reimbursement mechanism, the bill would alleviate some of the fiscal pressures currently faced by ambulance providers operating under the longstanding Medi-Cal system. This change is particularly relevant as it addresses the financial viability of delivering essential medical transportation within California's healthcare framework.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1328, introduced by Assembly Member Michelle Rodriguez, seeks to amend the Welfare and Institutions Code to establish specific reimbursement rates for nonemergency ambulance transportation services under the Medi-Cal program. The bill mandates that starting July 1, 2026, Medi-Cal fee-for-service reimbursement for these services will equal 80% of the federal Medicare ambulance fee schedule, adjusted according to the Geographic Practice Cost Index. This aligns reimbursement rates with federal standards and ensures a level of financial support for service providers.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 1328 appears to be supportive among healthcare providers and advocacy groups, as it reflects an understanding of the operational challenges faced in providing necessary medical transports. However, there may also be concerns about the state's ability to sustain these changes amidst ongoing budget considerations and the potential implications for state healthcare funding. The bill appears to have garnered bipartisan support during initial discussions.

Contention

One point of contention surrounding AB 1328 may arise from the financial implications it imposes on the state budget, specifically concerning the appropriation of funds necessary to implement these reimbursement changes. While the bill prescribes conditions for maximizing federal funding participation, the reliance on state funds in the absence of federal support could lead to debates among lawmakers regarding fiscal responsibility and the prioritization of healthcare funding amidst competing state needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB324

An act to amend Sections 14184.

CA AB116

An act to amend Sections 1276.

CA AB27

An act to add Sections 17157.

CA AB669

An act to add Sections 1367.

CA SB246

An act to add Section 14105.

CA AB904

An act to amend Sections 10213.

CA SB716

An act to add and repeal Section Sections 873.

CA AB1528

An act to amend Sections 10213.

CA AB880

An act to amend Sections 927.

CA SB433

An act to amend Section 1569.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.