California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1197

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Refer
4/28/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/23/25  
Refer
5/23/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  
Refer
6/26/25  
Report Pass
7/15/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  
Chaptered
10/7/25  

Caption

Rental passenger vehicles: electronic surveillance technology: renter liability for loss due to theft.

Impact

The revisions introduce a presumption that renters would not be liable for theft of a rented vehicle, provided they return the ignition key. This change is significant as it formalizes protections for renters, while also allowing rental companies the necessary tools to track vehicles in instances of unauthorized use or theft. The bill emphasizes the delicate balance between enabling firms to protect their assets while safeguarding consumer rights concerning personal information and privacy.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1197, introduced by Calderon, amends Sections 1939.03 and 1939.23 of the Civil Code concerning rental passenger vehicles. The bill modifies current regulations to allow rental companies to employ geofence technology to monitor rental vehicle movement under specific circumstances. It aims to update existing laws that limit the use of electronic surveillance technology by rental companies, particularly around the tracking of vehicles for theft recovery purposes while establishing clearer liability guidelines for renters in case of theft or damage to the rented vehicle.

Sentiment

Overall, supporters of AB 1197 are positive about the bill, viewing it as necessary to modernize rental practices in an era where technological capabilities are advancing. Conversely, there may be apprehensions regarding the implications for privacy and the potential misuse of surveillance technologies. Hence, stakeholders including consumer advocacy groups may voice concerns regarding how this technology could impact renter privacy rights.

Contention

One point of contention centers on the extent of liability assigned to renters and the implications of using surveillance tech like geofencing. Critics may argue that while the intent is to prevent theft and manage risk for companies, it could lead to overreach where renters' privacy might be compromised. Moreover, there's a need for transparency on how data from electronic surveillance will be used and stored to ensure that renters are not unfairly penalized.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1374

Rental passenger vehicle transactions: third parties.

CA AB1650

Rental vehicles: law enforcement.

CA HB2303

Total loss vehicle; electronic signatures

CA S0684

Electronic Signatures Associated with Total Loss Vehicles and Vessels

CA AB435

Vehicles: child passenger restraints.

CA SB071

Use of Surveillance Technology by Law Enforcement

CA HB382

An Act To Amend Titles 6 And 21 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Rental Cars And Peer- To-peer Car Sharing Loss Of Use.

CA HB4008

Crime-free lease addendum; renters

CA SB1480

Crime-free lease addendum; renters.

CA SB477

To Create The Offense Of Theft Of Equipment Rental Services.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.