Arizona 2026 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2906

Introduced
1/28/26  
Report Pass
2/9/26  
Report Pass
2/16/26  
Engrossed
2/26/26  
Report Pass
3/18/26  

Caption

Dental board; membership

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 2906 aim to ensure a diverse representation within the dental board and bolster the regulatory effectiveness of dental practices in Arizona. By specifying the qualifications for board members, the bill seeks to enhance the oversight of dental licensure and examination processes. The inclusion of both public and business entity members can potentially provide broader perspectives on dental governance and practices, impacting how regulations are framed and enforced at the state level.

Summary

House Bill 2906 proposes amendments to Section 32-1203 of the Arizona Revised Statutes concerning the composition and appointment process for the state board of dental examiners. The bill dictates that the board will consist of six licensed dentists, with specific requirements for membership including an oral and maxillofacial surgeon, licensed dental hygienists, public members, and a business entity member. Furthermore, it establishes the process for members' appointment by the governor, including the requirement for a criminal records check through fingerprint submission.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 2906 appears to be generally supportive, especially among dental professionals and advocates for regulatory reforms in the state. There is a common acknowledgment of the importance of having qualified individuals overseeing dental practices. However, some proponents of local governance may express concerns regarding the potential limitations on community input in the board's decision-making processes, although no significant opposition was noted in the documented discussions.

Contention

While there is broad support for HB 2906, some contention may arise regarding the implications of including public and business entity members, particularly about their influence on clinical decisions. Critics might argue that this could lead to a conflict of interest in regulatory decisions. Additionally, limiting board members to serving no more than two consecutive terms can be a point of contention, as it might hinder the continuity and experience within the board.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ SB1235

Health profession regulatory boards; membership

AZ HB2312

Dental board; continuation

AZ HB2190

Dentists; dental hygienists; compact

AZ SB1448

Compact; dentists; dental hygienists

AZ HB2313

Health boards; state agencies; continuations

AZ SB1124

Dental board; oral preventive assistants

AZ HB2026

Dental board; hearings; hygienist supervision

AZ HB2083

Game and fish commission; membership

AZ HB2828

Dental board; fingerprint card; maintenance

AZ HB2027

Behavior analysts; regulatory board

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.