Arizona 2026 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2171

Introduced
1/13/26  
Report Pass
2/2/26  
Report Pass
2/9/26  

Caption

Land ownership; hostile entities; prohibition

Impact

If enacted, HB2171 would significantly amend existing Arizona statutes related to property ownership. It introduces strict regulations regarding the sale and leasing of real estate to specified foreign entities, thereby protecting state interests against perceived threats posed by hostile countries. The bill aims to prevent potential national security risks associated with foreign entities acquiring strategic land in Arizona. By creating a framework that limits foreign ownership, it seeks to maintain local autonomy over real estate transactions.

Summary

House Bill 2171 aims to prohibit the ownership and leasing of real property in Arizona by entities deemed hostile. This includes entities owned or controlled by foreign governments such as China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia, as well as their affiliates. The bill is a response to growing concerns about national security and economic stability associated with foreign ownership of American land and properties. The legislation mandates that existing foreign owners of property must dispose of their interests within one year of the bill's effective date, thereby centralizing control over foreign land ownership in the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB2171 reflects a strong inclination towards protecting state interests and national security. Proponents argue that it is a necessary measure to safeguard the state against foreign encroachment and ensure that land ownership remains within the hands of U.S. citizens. However, there are concerns from opponents who view the bill as overly restrictive, potentially harming international relations and foreign investment in Arizona. The debate centers on balancing security needs with the economic benefits of foreign investment.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the identification of what constitutes a 'hostile entity' and the implications for existing property owners who do not align with the new regulations. Critics argue that the bill may disproportionately affect local economies that rely on foreign investments. Additionally, there are concerns about the classification of properties and the enforcement mechanisms, such as the responsibilities of state departments to monitor compliance and manage the sale of properties that fail to meet the new ownership requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

AZ SB1082

Land ownership; designated countries; prohibition

AZ SB1109

Designated countries; land ownership; prohibition

AZ SB1066

Foreign entities; land; legislative approval

AZ HB2867

Antisemitism; public schools; prohibition; penalties

AZ SB1031

Cosmetics sales; animal testing; prohibitions

AZ SB1523

Water use; prohibition; landscaping

AZ HB2696

Critical Infrastructure; foreign adversary; prohibition

AZ HB2221

Law enforcement; defunding; prohibition

AZ HB2693

Genetic sequencing; insurance; prohibition

AZ HB2107

Right to redeem; foreclosure; prohibition

Similar Bills

AZ SB1683

Landownership; foreign adversary; prohibition

CA SB1176

Agricultural land: prohibited foreign actors.

CA AB1857

Unlawfully restrictive covenants: grocery stores and supermarkets.

CT HB06735

An Act Prohibiting The Ownership, Possession Or Acquisition Of Interests In Real Property Upon Or Abutting Military Installations Or Agricultural Lands By Certain Foreign Entities.

CA SB614

Public resources: transportation of carbon dioxide.

CA SB1139

Monterey Peninsula Water Management District: nonfunctional turf: noncompliance and enforcement.

AZ SB1082

Land ownership; designated countries; prohibition

AZ SB1109

Designated countries; land ownership; prohibition