Arkansas 2025 Regular Session

Arkansas Senate Bill SB591

Introduced
3/31/25  
Refer
3/31/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Engrossed
4/9/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
4/15/25  
Enrolled
4/16/25  
Chaptered
4/23/25  

Caption

To Prohibit Race-selection Abortion In This State; And To Create The Race Discrimination By Abortion Prohibition Act.

Impact

If enacted, SB591 will add provisions to the Arkansas Code, specifically prohibiting intentional abortions that are requested based purely on the racial identity of the fetus. Violations of this prohibition could result in criminal penalties, classified as a Class A misdemeanor for medical practitioners who perform such abortions. Additionally, civil liabilities may arise for physicians and healthcare providers who fail to adhere to the stipulations detailed within the bill. It also ensures the anonymity of women who may be affected by these laws, protecting their personal information throughout any legal proceedings.

Summary

Senate Bill 591, also known as the Race Discrimination by Abortion Prohibition Act, aims to prohibit abortions performed solely based on the race of the unborn child in the state of Arkansas. This legislation seeks to address concerns regarding discrimination and is framed as an effort to combat race-selection abortions that may occur within the state. The bill establishes legal definitions for terms related to abortion and outlines the responsibilities of physicians who perform abortions, including a requirement to inquire about and disclose the race of the unborn child to the pregnant woman.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB591 is mixed, with proponents arguing that it is a necessary step to eliminate racial discrimination in abortion practices. Supporters view it as a moral and ethical imperative to ensure that the lives of unborn children are valued equally regardless of their race. Conversely, critics argue that the bill may infringe upon women's rights and complicate access to abortion services, expressing concerns that it may create barriers to necessary healthcare. The discussion surrounding the bill reflects broader societal debates about race, personal choice, and reproductive rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential ramifications for women seeking abortions and whether the legislation could lead to undue legal liabilities for healthcare providers. Opponents of the bill have raised alarms about how such a prohibition could impact women's autonomy and create ethical dilemmas for medical professionals. The legal implications of enforcement and the potential for stigmatization of women seeking abortions for any reason have sparked debate, drawing attention from both civil rights advocates and reproductive rights activists.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA ACA6

Slavery.

AZ HB2867

Antisemitism; public schools; prohibition; penalties

AZ HB2618

Voluntary prohibited possessor; definition

AZ HB2291

Voluntary prohibited possessor; definition

AZ SB1808

Homeowners' associations; allied countries' flags

AZ SB1378

Political signs; homeowners' associations

AZ SB1184

HOAs; uniformed services division flags

CA AB1238

California Energy Consumer Freedom Act.