Delaware House Bill HR19

Delaware 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/5/25
• Introduced: 11/7/25
• Refer: 11/5/25
• Engrossed: 11/13/25

Caption

Amending The Rules Of The House Of Representatives Of The 153rd General Assembly Relating To Remote Participation In Special Session.

Impact

The implementation of HR19 could significantly alter how legislative business is conducted, particularly during special sessions. The bill defines a special session as any convening of the House outside the first half of the calendar year, thus creating specific timelines and conditions for remote participation. By allowing electronic means of participation, the bill aims to enhance legislative continuity and ensure that members can maintain their involvement in the legislative process even when unable to attend physically.

Summary

House Resolution No. 19, amended by House Substitute No. 1, seeks to modify the Rules of the House of Representatives of the 153rd General Assembly to allow members to participate remotely in special sessions, provided that a quorum is physically present. The bill aims to adapt the legislative process to modern technological advancements and make participation more accessible, especially in light of unexpected circumstances that might impede physical attendance. The authorization for remote participation requires a written request to be approved by the Speaker, highlighting the bill's structured approach to facilitating this change.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around HR19 seems to reflect a recognition of the necessity for flexibility in legislative procedures. Supporters have voiced approval for this proactive move toward embracing technology, arguing it helps accommodate diverse circumstances in which members might find themselves. However, there may also be concerns regarding the adequacy of remote participation compared to in-person engagement, which could lead to debates on the effectiveness of communication in a virtually facilitated environment.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HR19 relate to the Speaker's role in controlling remote participation. Critics may voice concerns over the potential for subjective decision-making in determining who may participate remotely and under what conditions. The requirement for members to appear on camera when voting or responding during a roll call could also lead to debates about privacy and the implications of remote participation on the traditional legislative process.